Skip to content

Spinal Or General Anesthesia For Umblical Hernia Surgery

Should General Anesthesia or Spinal Aneshtesia With Ketofol Sedation Be Applied in Umblical Hernia Operations ?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06426225
Enrollment
44
Registered
2024-05-23
Start date
2024-05-15
Completion date
2024-08-15
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General Anesthesia, Spinal Aneshtesia, Umbilical Hernia

Brief summary

In this study, the investigators compared spinal anesthesia under ketofol (ketamine-propofol combination) sedation with general anesthesia in terms of intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, respiratory parameters and cost in patients undergoing umbilical hernia operation. the investigator aimed to provide the most appropriate and hemodynamically stable option for the patient, to decrease the complication rates and to reduce the associated costs.

Detailed description

This study was carried out at the Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital Operating Room, after receiving ethics committee approval.Preoperative evaluation was performed before the operation in cases undergoing elective umbilical hernia surgery.Complications and side effects are explained in detail.Verbal and written consents were obtained from the subjects who agreed to participate in the study.In patients undergoing umbilical hernia surgery, general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia under propofol and ketamine (ketamine-propofol combination) sedation were compared in terms of intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, aldrete score, pain score, respiratory parameters, and cost. The patients, who had fasted for 8 hours before the operation, were taken to the operating room without premedication. In all cases, a peripheral venous catheter cannulated on the dorsal part of the hand (20G, Plusflon i.v. Cannula, India) .Standard monitoring was applied. Group1. As premedication 0.03mg/kg midazolam was administered . For spinal anesthesia, 15 mg heavy-bupivacaine, sedation was provided with ketofol. ketamine:propofol mixture was prepared as 1:1 5mg/ml propofol and 5mg/ml ketamine 1 mg/kg ketofol administered i.v. Group2 . As premedication 0.03mg/kg midazolam was administered.In general anesthesia to all patients after induction 3 mg/kg propofol, 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium and 1 mcg/kg fentanyl Bispectral index and non-invasive blood pressure was monitored, a urinary catheter was placed. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and fentanyl to keep BIS values between 40-60.

Interventions

OTHERGeneral Anesthesia

General Anesthesia Applied Group 2 Patients.

OTHERSpinal Aneshtesia

Spinal Anesthesia and Ketofol Sedation Applied Group 1 Patients.

Sponsors

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA I-II patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who would undergo Umbilical hernia surgery were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* who do not accept the procedure * serious cardiovasculer disease ,renal, hematological (bleeding diathesis, under anticoagulant therapy, those with hemoglobin value below 10 g/dl) disease, hepatic disease, cerebrovascular, neurological or psychiatric diseases, * those who are contraindicated for spinal anesthesia, * Those who are allergic to one of the local anesthetics to be used, with drug and alcohol addiction, * pregnant or breastfeeding * using drugs and analgesics effective on the central nervous system were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CostFrom hospital admission to dischargeBill amount during hospitalization
mean arterial blood pressurepreoperative 0. minute, intraoperative 10.minute, intraoperative 20.minute, intraoperative 30.minute, Postoperative 0.minute, Postoperative 10.minute, Postoperative 20.minute, Postoperative 30.minutenon invasive blood pressure measurement
hospital stayFrom hospital admission to dischargeLength of hospital stay was recorded.
Heart Ratepreoperative 0. minute, intraoperative 10.minute, intraoperative 20.minute, intraoperative 30.minute, Postoperative 0.minute, Postoperative 10.minute, Postoperative 20.minute, Postoperative 30.minuteDuring Perioperative Period Heart rate was measured
systolic blood pressurepreoperative 0. minute, intraoperative 10.minute, intraoperative 20.minute, intraoperative 30.minute, Postoperative 0.minute, Postoperative 10.minute, Postoperative 20.minute, Postoperative 30.minutenon invasive blood pressure measurement
diastolic blood pressurepreoperative 0. minute, intraoperative 10.minute, intraoperative 20.minute, intraoperative 30.minute, Postoperative 0.minute, Postoperative 10.minute, Postoperative 20.minute, Postoperative 30.minutenon invasive blood pressure measurement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Aldrete ScorePostoperative first 1 hourPostoperative Aldrete score was evaluated.
Postoperative NRSPostoperative 30.minute, Postoperative 12. hourpostoperative numeric rating scale was evaluated, 0-10 scale, with zero meaning no pain and 10 meaning the worst pain imaginable

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026