Dislocation, Pain and Anxiety, Suture
Conditions
Brief summary
Study and evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality in pain management.
Detailed description
Study and evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality in pain management.This is an open prospective observational study carried out at Urgences Fattouma Bourgiba Monastir. For all patients included, a data collection form must be completed, mentioning age, sex, medical and surgical history, and the type of procedure planned. * If initial VAS \>5 and intolerable: patients will immediately use painkillers and will be excluded from the study. * If initial VAS \<=5 or \> 5 but tolerable: Only VR glasses are used as an analgesic. If during the procedure the patient describes intolerable pain: the VAS will be noted, and the patient will use a rescue analgesic (intranasal ketamine or other at the discretion of the attending physician). The VR device consists of a pair of VR glasses with a video previously chosen and installed. Patient preparation must be done before initiating the protocol. The first step is to choose patient candidates for VR who are understanding and interested. Guardian approval is required; then it is necessary to explain the principle, the stages and the benefits of the care. The intensity of pain is calculated according to the visual analog scale before, during the procedure and 30 minutes after as well as the max VAS during the procedure, the 'Children Fear Scale', the satisfaction score and any adverse effects are noted.
Interventions
OTHERVR device
The VR device consists of a pair of VR glasses with a video previously chosen and installed. Patient preparation must be done before initiating the protocol. The first step is to choose patient candidates for VR who are understanding and interested. Guardian approval is required; then it is necessary to explain the principle, the stages and the benefits of the care. The intensity of pain is calculated according to the visual analog scale before, during the procedure and 30 minutes after as well as the max VAS during the procedure, the 'Children Fear Scale', the satisfaction score and any adverse effects are noted.
Sponsors
University of Monastir
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients aged 09 and 24 years * suturing a wound * changing a dressing * lumbar puncture, * peripheral venous line * blood test * intramuscular injection * reduction of a fracture * casting or plastering.
Exclusion criteria
* impaired consciousness * epilepsy * wound/infection covering the helmet area * headache * intellectual/mental retardation * nausea, vomiting * patient already included in the protocol * pain requiring immediate medical attention. analgesic (VAS \>5 and described as intolerable).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| frequency of success | 30 minutes | frequency of success (%) (use of emergency analgesics) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| reduction of pain | 30 minutes | reduction in pain assessed by the visual analog scale (mm) |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| occurrence of adverse events and patient satisfaction | 3 hours | occurrence of adverse events, tolerance to glasses, patient satisfaction (Likert Satisfaction Scale) and max VAS during the procedure. |
Contacts
Primary ContactNOUIRA Semir, PR
Backup ContactGANNOUN IMEN, ARC
Outcome results
None listed