Skip to content

Postoperative Pain After Pulpectomy of Primary Molars

Postoperative Pain After Pulpectomy of Primary Molars Using Two Different Root Canal Obturation Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06424353
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-05-22
Start date
2024-01-20
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2024-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain

Brief summary

Testing postopertive pain after pulpectomy of primary molars with endoflas using modified Wong-Baker scale of pain.

Detailed description

Testing postopertive pain after pulpectomy of primary molars with endoflas using lentilospiral files and pressure seringe by using modified Wong-Baker scale of pain.

Interventions

obturation of root canals of primary molars with Endoflas using pressure seringe and lentilospiral files

Sponsors

Minia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The current study will include children who meet the following clinical and radiographic criteria: 3.1a.Clinical: 1. 5-7-year old children categorized as class I or II according to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) scale. 2. Children rated as no.3 or 4 in Frankel behavior rating scale (FBRS). 3. Presence of at least one primary molar with deep carious lesion. 4. Asymptomatic necrotic molars confirmed by the absence of bleeding on opening of the pulp chamber. 3.1b. Radiographic: 1. Extensive caries approaching to the pulp. 2. Presence of at least two-thirds of root length.

Exclusion criteria

* A child's tooth with any of the following criteria: 3.2a. Clinical findings: 1. History of spontaneous unprovoked toothache. 2. Extensive crown destruction that preclude coronal restoration. 3. Presence of adjacent or opposing tooth with deep carious lesion in the same side. 4. History of administering analgesics 12 hours before tooth obturation. 3.2b. Radiographic findings: 1. Presence of a large furcation or periapical radiolucency approximating the succedaneous tooth. 2. Presence of pathological internal/external root resorption. 3. Absence of underlying permanent successor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative painafter one day and after one weekMeasuring post operative pain after pulpectomy with two different obturation techniques using (Modified Wong-backer scale of pain )which have four scales from( 0 to 3) which 0 is the better outcome( no pain) and 3 is the worst (severe pain)

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactshimaa m abd elhafeez, postgraduate
drshimaaalhhafeez93@gmail.com+0201068976757
Backup ContactOsama s Gad El-Hak, phD
osama.seif@mu.edu.eg00201023449797

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026