Skip to content

Mitigating Toxicity by Electronic Health Portal-mediated Interactive Monitoring of Patient-reported Side Effects

Mitigating Toxicity of (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy by Applying Electronic Health Portal-mediated Interactive Monitoring of Patient-reported Side Effects: the Prospective Randomized eChemoCoach Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06424054
Acronym
eChemoCoach
Enrollment
746
Registered
2024-05-21
Start date
2025-06-01
Completion date
2029-12-01
Last updated
2024-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, eHealth, Self Management, Symptom Monitoring

Keywords

Breast Cancer, remote monitoring, emonitoring, eHealth, symptom management, symptom monitoring

Brief summary

Chemotherapy induces side effects varying in severity, impacting patients' quality of life and necessitating unplanned hospital care. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) could aid in early detection and management of side effects. However, existing PRO monitoring lacks triage capabilities, leading to clinician involvement and suboptimal symptom management. The investigators propose eChemoCoach, an electronic questionnaire integrated into the electronic health portal, offering real-time symptom assessment and personalized advice based on CTCAE criteria. Our study aims to assess the impact of eChemoCoach on non-hematological CTCAE ≥ 3 graded side effects in early breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. This is a randomized controlled trial involving 746 patients that will evaluate the eChemoCoach's efficacy compared to standard monitoring. Phase one will validate questionnaires and assess usability, while phase two focuses on the primary outcome. Te investigators anticipate reduced severe side effects, thereby enhancing patients' quality of life, reducing stress, and minimizing hospital visits.

Detailed description

Problem description: The aim of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy is to increase survival. Therefore, treatment adherence is important. However, patients may experience treatment-related side-effects. In current practice, clinicians evaluate toxicity just a few days before the next chemotherapy is scheduled. Monitoring and timely anticipation of chemotherapy related side-effects may prevent escalation of toxicity, increase treatment adherence and reduce the decline in quality of life. Evaluating toxicity more frequently and on-demand could be a solution to reduce severe toxicity. Therefore, patients should receive a direct advice when experiencing side-effects. However, without interference of a health care professional, this is not possible in standard care. Solution / research direction: There is increasing evidence that incorporating patient reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical care enhances symptom monitoring in cancer patients. Therefore, it is desirable to develop and investigate an electronic smart-phrased side-effects questionnaire which: 1) delivers a real-time personalized advice to the patient, based on CTCAE grading, after the questionnaire is completed and 2) is accessible for patients using an electronic health portal (EHP) of the electronic health record (EHR) to integrate the PRO data into the EHR. Aim / hypothesis: To investigate the effect of adding weekly EHP-mediated monitoring of chemotherapy related side-effects based on CTCAE grading using smart-phrased electronic PRO side-effects questionnaires to standard of care monitoring of side-effects, on the occurrence of CTCAE \>= grade 3 toxicity. Plan of investigation: To conduct a pilot study to validate the smart-phrased ePRO side-effects questionnaire. Thereafter, a multicenter clinical randomized trial will start where patients with breast cancer qualifying for (neo)adjuvant chemo(immune)therapy will be randomized to real-time EHP-mediated monitoring of side-effects using a novel smart-phrased ePRO side-effects questionnaire in addition to standard of care monitoring, or to standard of care monitoring solely. Primary objective is the overall rate of CTC grade \>=3 non hematological toxicity between both arms. Secondary objectives include relative dose intensity, health-related quality of life, experienced distress, the number of unplanned health care usage and costs. Expected outcome: The investigators hypothesize that adding weekly EHP-mediated monitoring of side-effects using ePRO side-effects questionnaires will significantly lower the occurrence rate of CTCAE grade \>=3 non-hematological toxicities.

Interventions

OTHEReChemoCoach

the eChemoCoach is an electronic questionnaire which is accessible for patients via the secured electronic health portal (EHP) of the EHR, which is CE-certified. By utilizing the eChemoCoach, patients (for this project we focus on breast cancer patients) have the ability to complete a questionnaire on a daily basis, when experiencing side effects. The eChemoCoach has the potential to evaluate the severity of adverse effects based on the CTCAE criteria and triage them, mimicking the decision-making process of a HCP through computer adaptive testing (CAT). Upon completing the questionnaire, the eChemoCoach translates the responses for each specific side effect into corresponding CTCAE grades. The tool then promptly offers patients personalized advice, tailored to their individual condition.

Sponsors

Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Twente
CollaboratorOTHER
Dutch Cancer Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep
CollaboratorNETWORK
Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This is a open label study since blinding is not possible as healthcare professionals will receive the CTC gradation based on the reported side effects in the intervention group and are obligated to act on these reports.

Intervention model description

A clinical randomized controlled trial will be performed in 746 breast cancer patients treated with (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients will be randomized to the intervention group, using the eChemoCoach in addition to standard of care monitoring to manage side effects or are randomized to solely standard of care monitoring.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \- Starting (neo)adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy for breast cancer according to one of the below mentioned treatment protocols: * Four cycles of doxorubicin 60mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 (AC) dose dense q 2 weeks, followed by twelve cycles of weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 (also in combination with carboplatin AUC6 q 3 weeks) * Nine cycles q 3 weeks of paclitaxel 80mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, carboplatin AUC 3 on day 1 and 8, trastuzumab 8mg/kg loading dose (followed by doses of 6mg/m2 at subsequent cycles) on day1 and pertuzumab loading dose of 840mg (followed by doses of 420mg at subsequent cycles) on day 1 * Age ≥ 18 years * WHO PS ≤1 * Capable of using the EHP or get help in case of low (e-)health literacy. This includes being capable of login using DigiD, a system used by the Dutch government to verify the identity of a person * Being able to read or get help from a relative in case of illiteracy

Exclusion criteria

* \- Participation in a trial with an investigational product (because more frequent and structured symptom reporting is performed in these studies). * Patients who have been treated with chemotherapy in the past (since these patients are at higher risk for developing side effects of current chemotherapy). * Patients that already started with their chemotherapy cycle

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The occurrence of any non-hematological side effects grade ≥3Up to 30 weeks after start chemotherapyThe occurrence of any non-hematological side effects grade ≥3 during neo-adjuvant or adjuvant treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative dose intensity (RDI)Up to 30 weeks after start chemotherapyFor analyzing the RDI, the RDI will be calculated for each chemotherapeutic agent and presented as mean with standard deviations (SD) (for a description of calculation of the RDI see the objective section paragraph 2.0). The RDI will be calculated per cycle. The RDI will be compared between the intervention and the control group.
HRQOLon baseline, 10 and 20 weeks after start of chemotherapyHealth-related quality of life measured by the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30s). Scale is ranging from 1 to 4. 1 = not at all, 4 = very much. Higher scores mean a worse QOL.
Patient experienced anxietyon baseline, 10 and 20 weeks after start of chemotherapyPatient experienced anxiety measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Scale is ranging from 0 to 3. 0 = often, 3 = never. Higher scores means a less worse Hads score.
Patient empowermenton baseline, 10 and 20 weeks after start of chemotherapyPatient empowerment using Patient Activation Measure (PAM13) questionnaire. Ranging from 0 to 3. 0 = I do not agree, 3= I totally agree. A lower score is worse.
Toxicity patternsUp to 30 weeks after start chemotherapyTime to occurrence of both grade 2 and grade ≥3 toxicity will be analyzed with a Kaplan-Meier curves. Occurrence of grade 2 side effects during (neo)adjuvant will be presented as numbers with percentages for patients in both study groups.
Unplanned CareUp to 30 weeks after start chemotherapyThe amount of unplanned hospital care will be presented as median (IQR) and will be analyzed by comparing the number of admissions, unplanned visits, days of hospital admissions between the intervention and control group using Poisson regression analysis.
Validation of eChemoCoach questionnairesDuring the first year of the studyCognitive interviews will be analyzed with thematic content analysis. Agreement between professional triage estimations and eChemoCoach will be quantified using Cohen's Kappa coefficient. A semi qualitative assessment will be conducted, comparing the patient-reported adverse effects using eChemoCoach with medical professionals' CTCAE severity assessments. Interviews will be analyzed with thematic content analysis.
UsabilityAfter inclusion of all intervention patientsThe System Usability Scale will be used for global assessment of the eChemoCoach. usability. Usability will also be assessed by healthcare professionals from participating. sites. The SUS is a 10 item questionnaire with 5 response options. Ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The average SUS score from all 500 studies is a 68. A SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average.
Agreement eChemoCoach-reported grades and those reported by PRO-CTCAE, HCPs, and the Dutch translation of CTCAEUp to 30 weeks after start chemotherapyTo assess the concordance among eChemoCoach-reported grades, PRO-CTCAE, and CTCAEs graded by healthcare professionals (HCPs), we employ the eChemoCoach platform for patient experienced symptom data collection. Each questionnaire administered includes the eChemoCoach and the PRO-CTCAE questionnaire, facilitating immediate and direct comparison of both outcomes. HCPs will document symptom grading in patient files using standardized CTCAE forms. HCPs will grade the severity on pre-planned checks (standard of care) and when necessary in case of severe side effects.
Patient experienced stresson baseline, 10 and 20 weeks after start of chemotherapyPatient experienced stress using a distress thermometer. Ranging from 0 to 10 per problem. 0 = no problem, 10 = worst. A higher score means more stress.

Contacts

Primary ContactManon Hanrath-Komen, PhD
m.m.c.komen@nwz.nl0031 72 5482872
Backup ContactRubin Verduin, drs
rjt.verduin@nwz.nl0625289930

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026