Skip to content

Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia on Postoperative Liver Function

Comparison of Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia on Postoperative Liver Function in Patients With Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06423846
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-05-21
Start date
2024-01-26
Completion date
2024-05-12
Last updated
2024-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Keywords

Total Intravenous Anesthesia, Inhalation Anesthesia, Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Brief summary

The pandemic of obesity has become a serious issue of public health worldwide as the size of the obese population has almost tripled over the last four decades and continues to riseزThe epidemic of obesity has led to a significant increase in the prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD is currently the most common chronic liver disease, with an estimated global prevalence at 25-30%, rising up to 90% in morbidly obese patients

Detailed description

Anesthesia and surgery may deteriorate liver function in patients with elevated liver enzyme levels; therefore, in these patients, choosing anaesthetics with less hepatotoxicity may be important. Halothane, which is a typical inhalational anesthetic, is known for its liver and kidney toxicity. The latest anesthetic agents, including sevoflurane and desflurane, are associated with less hepatotoxicity, although rare cases of acute liver injury have been reported with these agentsزPropofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is an intravenous anesthetic. Its pharmacokinetic profile makes it very suitable for total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and this is a widely used technique in many centers. Its use results in a rapid onset and offset with fewer side effects including postoperative nausea and vomiting, making it particularly favorable in the ambulatory setting

Interventions

For patients in the SEVO group, general anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg, fentanyl 1 ug/kg and then maintained with sevoflurane in air and oxygen, dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg/hour.

Patients in the TIVA group had anesthesia induced with propofol 2 mg/kg , fentanyl 1 ug/kg and maintained with propofol. 200 ug/kg/min, fentanyl 0.1ug/kg/min, dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg/hour

Sponsors

Benha University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The participants were randomized into two equal groups using a computer-generated list of random numbers sealed in an opaque envelope and were randomly allocated into two groups on a scale of 1:1.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Obese patients * had ASA I-III * diagnosed with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) liver disease * undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Exclusion criteria

* cases wherein surgeries were performed using anesthetic methods that were not clearly identified as TIVA or INHA * heart surgery or cesarean section, and cases of neuromuscular diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
visual analogue scalevisual analogue scale was measured at day one and day two postoperativelyPain was assessed by using the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain (0-no pain, 10-worst imaginable pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction24 hours postoperatively5-point Likert scale, (1=extremely dissatisfied; 5=extremely satisfied)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026