Skip to content

Randomized Trial to Optimize Virologic Suppression Rates Using a Point-of-Care Urine Monitoring Assay (ROVING PUMA)

Randomized Trial to Optimize Virologic Suppression Rates Using a Point-of-Care Urine Monitoring Assay (ROVING PUMA)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06423612
Acronym
ROVING-PUMA
Enrollment
500
Registered
2024-05-21
Start date
2025-05-08
Completion date
2026-11-30
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ART Adherence

Keywords

ART, Adherence, South Africa, Viral Suppression, ART resistance, POC urine assay, TDF assay

Brief summary

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has significantly decreased the morbidity and mortality of HIV infection. However, adherence challenges in taking daily oral ART persist. A retrospective cohort study across 31 countries from 2010-19 reported that only 65% of people with HIV (PWH) on ART exhibited virologic suppression (VS) three years after starting ART;1 the rate of VS in South Africa among PWH on ART is 60-65%. Adherence barriers span individual and structural factors, such as stigma, recall difficulties, housing and/or food insecurity, mental illness, substance use, transportation, stock-outs, and other factors that vary by country and population. Adherence interventions can benefit from direct objective adherence monitoring. Pharmacologic metrics of adherence assess drug levels in plasma, dried blood spots, hair (a metric our group pioneered) or urine and predict outcomes more accurately than self-reported adherence. However, most of these metrics preclude real-time assessment, requiring expensive laboratory equipment and trained laboratory personnel. Thus, few adherence interventions have successfully incorporated objective metrics, likely due to laboratory and shipping delays. A low-cost (\<$2/test) point-of-care adherence metric - developed by our group - should allow for real-time biofeedback and improve the impact of metric-driven adherence interventions.

Detailed description

This is a randomized hybrid type 1 effectiveness study design to assess the factors related to implementation of a point-of-care urine TFV assay test into routine HIV clinical care. We plan to recruit a total of 500 adults living with HIV who received primary HIV care from one of the selected study clinics in BCM, Eastern Cape. Individuals who have been prescribed ART for at least 6 months who have not achieved VS will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion at the baseline visit to the intervention arm vs. the SoC arm. Total duration of the study is 18 months from the time of enrollment.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPOC urine assay informed enhanced ART adherence counselling for viral suppression

Collect urine on intervention participants and screen for presence of TFV. Feedback will be provided to the participant based on the results on their ART adherence with provision of enhanced ART adherence counseling for viral suppression.

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER
Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Cape Town
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized hybrid type 1 effectiveness trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Aim 1: Individuals ≥18 years of age at the initial screening visit living with HIV, prescribed ART for at least three months, and are not virally suppressed. Aim 2: Same as Aim 1 for the acceptability survey and in-depth interviews. HIV care providers in the selected clinic sites for the feasibility survey and in-depth interviews. Aim 3: Same as Aim 1 for the cost-effectiveness study.

Exclusion criteria

* Currently enrolled in another ART adherence intervention * Patients on ART regimen that does not include Tenofovir * HIV care providers from non-study sites Failure to provide written consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Viral Suppression at 6 months18 monthsThe primary outcome of effectiveness will be viral suppression at 6 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Viral suppression at 9, 12, and 18months18 monthsDurability of the 6-month intervention on viral suppression at 9, 12, and 18months
Resistance testing and genotype results @ 6 and 18 months18 monthsThe effect of the intervention on need for resistance testing and genotype results @ 6 and 18 months
Feasibility and Acceptability of the intervention18 monthsAssess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention using a survey and in-depth interviews
Cost-effectiveness of the intervention18 monthsAssess the cost per patient, cost per additional patient with VS, and cost per disability-adjusted life-year averted from a society perspective with using the urine-based TFV adherence assay to inform adherence counseling vs. standard of care counseling.

Countries

South Africa

Contacts

CONTACTMonica Gandhi
monica.gandhi@ucsf.edu415 476 4082
CONTACTPurba Chatterjee
purba.chatterjee@ucsf.edu
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMonica Gandhi

University of California, San Francisco

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 21, 2026