Skip to content

Upper Limb Blood Flow Restriction in Handball Players

Efficacy of Upper Limb Blood Flow Restriction in Handball Players. Randomised Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06423196
Enrollment
22
Registered
2024-05-21
Start date
2024-05-19
Completion date
2024-07-01
Last updated
2025-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sports Physical Therapy

Keywords

Handball, Blood flow restriction, Muscle strength, Muscle activation, Upper limbs, Physiotherapy

Brief summary

Introduction. Blood flow restriction therapy involves the use of an occlusion cuff placed over an extremity resulting in a partial reduction of arterial blood flow and total restriction of venous return. Objectives. To analyse the efficacy of a physiotherapy intervention using blood flow restriction in improving upper limb strength in adult handball players. Methods. Randomised, single-blind, clinical study. 20 athletes will be recruited and randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. The intervention of the experimental group will consist of performing an exercise protocol after blood flow restriction. The intervention period will last 4 weeks, with a periodicity of 2 weekly sessions of 30 minutes each. The primary variable will be the strength of the triceps, epicondyle and epitrochlear musculature (pressure hand dynamometer). The secondary variable will be the muscle activation of this musculature (surface electromyography).

Interventions

OTHERExperimental group

In the development of the exercises, the players will mobilise dumbbells of different weights that will be estimated according to the calculation of 30% of 1 RM. This workload with dumbbells is based on previous work where blood flow restriction was used in healthy athletes.

Sponsors

Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Three assessments will be made throughout the study: before the intervention (T0), after the experimental phase (T1) and after a 4-week follow-up period (T2). All variables will be assessed by an evaluator blinded to the assignment of the athletes to the study groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Athletes over 18 years of age. * Federated in handball at the time of the study. * No lower limb injuries in the three months prior to the study. * Signing the informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

* Athletes who have undergone surgery in the year prior to the study. * People who do not attend at least 80% of the treatment sessions. * Players who are receiving physiotherapy treatment in parallel to the physical preparation of the team they are playing for.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess the muscle strength at screening visitScreening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after four weeks follow-upMuscle strength will be assessed with a pressure dynamometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle model). The strength of the triceps brachii, epicondyle and epitrochlear musculature will be measured. The evaluation protocol used by Morin et al. will be used. The unit of measurement is the Newton (the higher the value, the greater the muscle strength). The measurements are taken bilaterally. The mean value of the 2 measurements taken shall be used as a measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess the muscle activation at screening visitScreening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after four weeks follow-upMuscle activation will be measured by surface electromyography (model SHIMMMER2, Shimmer, Ireland). Electrode placement will be marked on standing subjects, and will be positioned according to European recommendations for the use of surface electromyography. A bipolar SEMG system will be used with circular electrodes of 10 mm diameter, 20 mm apart, placed longitudinally, in the direction of the muscle fibres under study, and with a reference electrode at a distance. The unit of measurement is µV, where the higher the score, the greater the muscle activation.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026