Skip to content

Comparing Dental Impression Methods for Children

Comparison of Traditional and Digital Impression Methods for Pediatric Patients in Terms of Satisfaction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06422611
Acronym
Digital
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-05-21
Start date
2023-04-20
Completion date
2023-08-20
Last updated
2024-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Impression, Pediatric Dentistry, Satisfaction

Brief summary

The precision of dental restorations and the production of dental models has improved due to the acceleration of technical advancement and the introduction of computer-aided manufacturing. The study's objective is to compare the conventional imprint approach with a digital one in order to compare patients' comfort levels, preferences, and treatment times among pediatric patients.

Detailed description

In this study, 60 volunteers without any prior exposure to traditional or digital impressions took part. Using a C-type impression medium, conventional impressions of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches were taken. Digital impressions are taken using an intra-oral scanner at the same appointment. Following the impressions, a standardized questionnaire was used to assess the individuals' attitudes, preferences, and perceptions of the impression procedures. The Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale was used to assess the perceived source of stress and Frankl Behavioural Scale was used for assessing behaviour. After taking the impression, the processing phases of the impression techniques (working time, etc.), and parental satisfaction were noted.

Interventions

DEVICEImpression methods

Both digital and conventional impressions were taken from same patients

Sponsors

Ege University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* not to have a history of digital or conventional impression taking * not to have temporomandibular joint and periodontal discomfort * not to be using psychiatric or neuropathic drugs

Exclusion criteria

* history of digital or conventional impression taking * TMJ disorder * Using any kind of drug that interferes pain perception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing patient preference and treatment comfortMarch 2023-June 2023Parental satisfaction was measured with a structured questionnaire.The Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale was used to assess the perceived source of stress and Frankl Behavioural Scale was used for assessing behaviour. A survey was designed to test 3 areas of patient satisfaction regarding the impression experience: comfort, time, and novelty. The survey consisted of 7 statements with a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) below each statement anchored with agree and disagree. The survey also included questions to determine whether the patient had previous experience with impressions.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026