Skip to content

Efficacy of Low-level Laser Acupuncture and Microcurrent Electrical Stimulation on Gag Reflex on Children

Efficacy of Low-level Laser Acupuncture and Microcurrent Electrical Stimulation on Gag Reflex on Children During Taking Dental Impression

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06422286
Enrollment
63
Registered
2024-05-20
Start date
2024-04-16
Completion date
2024-12-16
Last updated
2024-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gagging

Keywords

gag reflex, dental anxiety, low-level laser

Brief summary

the aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the laser acupuncture in comparison to the electroacupuncure for controlling gag reflex in children

Detailed description

the study will select children who are suffering from gag reflex that can affect their dental appointments negatively. they will be diagnosed then randomly distributed to one of the 3 groups of the study gag reflex and anxiety will be measured before and after the intervention then the results will be compared.

Interventions

children will be allocated to the device then the gag reflex will be re-evaluated

BIOLOGICALmicrocurrent stimulation

children will be allocated to the device then the gag reflex will be re-evaluated

DEVICEplacebo

children will be allocated to a deactivated meridian pen

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 9 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* children free of any systemic disease or special health care needs * children with score 2 or 3 according to the frankle behavioral rating scale * a full arch maxillary alginate impression is needed * moderate to severe gagging according to the gagging severity index * written informed consent of the legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

* children taking anti-emetic drugs * children sensitive to alginate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
gagging prevetive indeximmediately after the interventionthe difference in gagging preventive index before and after the intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
anxietyimmediately after the interventiondental anxiety will be measured before and after the intervention using pulse oximeter

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactsara salim, master
sarasalahsaleem@gmail.com01026643894
Backup Contactmarwa baraka, PHD
01000804757

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026