Skip to content

Four-unit Implant Supported Fixed Partial Dentures Fabricated From Different Materials

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Four-unit Implant Supported Fixed Partial Dentures Fabricated From Different Materials

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06422260
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-05-20
Start date
2023-01-19
Completion date
2025-01-29
Last updated
2024-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Loss, Prosthesis Survival

Brief summary

Implant supported superstructure is necessary for long term success and durability of the implant itself in terms of stresses distribution and fracture strength capability. Stresses falling on an implant are too much greater than those applied on a tooth structure with a periodontal ligament offering a degree of elasticity. The important mechanical and physical properties of materials used for the fabrication of dental prostheses include adequate flexural and tensile strength and modulus of elasticity, maximum fracture resistance, optimal bond strength and adequate polishability.

Detailed description

One objective of implant dentistry is to provide excellent esthetics and soft-tissue profiles in the esthetic zone. Esthetic requirements have focused primarily on the position, inclination, shape, and color of the restoration. However, the peri-implant soft tissue also plays a major role in the esthetics of an implant-supported restoration especially in the anterior region.

Interventions

OTHERProsthesis superstructure

Prosthesis superstructure for 2 implant supported short span fixed bride constructed from different materials

Sponsors

Menoufia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

* No systemic diseases that might alter the tissue response to implantation. * Mobility grade 3 at the site of the 4 lateral incisors. * sufficient available inter-arch space * normal maxillomandibular relation. * no temporomandibular joint

Exclusion criteria

* Grade 1 or 2 mobility at the incisor's region. * Patients with systematic diseases that contraindicate implant placement.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone loss4 yearsMeasurement of alveolar bone loss around implants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical performance of the prosthesis superstructure4 yearsSuch as fracture of the prosthesis.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohammed A. El-Sawy, PhD
Dr_sawy@windowslive.com01061314522
Backup ContactMohammed T. Khater, PhD
mohamed.tarek67@dent.menofia.edu.eg01003854552

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026