Skip to content

Continuity of Care Between Primary Care Cardiology and Specialty Services for Patients With Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease

Continuity of Care Between Primary Care Cardiology and Specialty Services for Patients With Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06421363
Acronym
CAPRICI
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-05-20
Start date
2024-06-01
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2024-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Ischemic Heart Disease

Keywords

inclisiran

Brief summary

1.1. Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in our country for over four decades. The pathophysiology of CVD begins with various cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) and their poor management, leading to subclinical lesions in target organs such as albuminuria or left ventricular hypertrophy, which may evolve into CVD. This progression is referred to as the cardiovascular continuum. Patients with chronic cardiovascular conditions require comprehensive periodic health monitoring in primary care (PC), including lifestyle advice and an assessment of comorbidities. Risk factors linked to disease progression are monitored and managed, along with medication reconciliation and planning follow-up care. Such activities, especially post-COVID, help maintain clinical stability and organize healthcare demand, reducing unnecessary interventions and costs. In Galicia, continuity of care programs for ischemic heart disease focus on optimizing service delivery at appropriate levels, including electronic consultations that improve healthcare accessibility, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Introducing Inclisiran for chronic CVD patients post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) hospitalization might streamline care continuity, reducing healthcare costs and improving outcomes. 1.2. Purpose The disruption of care continuity in patients post-ACS increases their risk of mortality and hospitalizations due to coronary complications and comorbidities, as well as emergency visits and unplanned healthcare interactions, thus elevating healthcare costs. We propose reorganizing care continuity for ACS patients by establishing a PC pathway with scheduled semi-annual visits to assess overall and cardiovascular health and to evaluate patient prognosis and healthcare resource utilization. 2\. Objectives 2.1. Primary Objectives The main goal is to evaluate whether a follow-up program incorporating Inclisiran treatment in patients with chronic coronary syndrome can optimize follow-up (reducing unscheduled visits to PC and hospital emergency departments), improve control of risk factors (like physical activity, adherence to a Mediterranean diet, lipid profiles, blood pressure, glycemic profile, and renal function), and decrease direct economic costs. 2.2. Secondary Objectives The secondary objectives include analyzing adherence to prescribed chronic pharmacological treatment, factors driving higher demand among patients with chronic coronary syndrome, reasons for emergency visits, hospital admissions, and causes of mortality among these patients. 3\. Methodology 3.1. Study Design A pilot, multicentric, analytical intervention study will be conducted involving five health centers in the Santiago de Compostela health area, with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria outlined. The study will monitor patients over 27 months, following a detailed protocol.

Interventions

DRUGInclisiran

Implementation of a follow-up program that incorporates Inclisiran treatment in patients with a history of chronic coronary syndrome

Sponsors

Jose Seijas Amigo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years 2. Prior diagnosis of chronic coronary disease At least one of the following: 1. Type 2 diabetes mellitus 2. Familial hypercholesterolemia 3. Recurrent coronary disease 4. Chronic kidney disease 3. Currently undergoing pharmacological treatment with high-potency statins, with or without ezetimibe. The allowed statins and daily doses are: 1. Atorvastatin 80mg 2. Rosuvastatin 20mg 3. Rosuvastatin 40mg 4. Patients on other statins or lower doses are acceptable if there has been documented intolerance to the specified molecules and doses. 4. Blood analysis with a lipid profile in the last 6 months and with the current treatment showing LDL levels \>100mg/dl.

Exclusion criteria

1. Not receiving statins in the therapeutic regimen. 2. Concomitant treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors. 3. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or a desire to conceive by the patient. 4. Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, are unable to adequately follow up in the chronic care program under routine clinical practice.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Unplanned Medical Visits2 YEARSNumber of unplanned visits for patients with chronic coronary syndrome in family medicine, nursing, telemedicine, and hospital consultations during follow-up.
Variation in Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet2 YEARSChange in adherence to the Mediterranean diet using the validated questionnaire PREDIMED. The test consists of 14 questions, in which the higher the score, the better the relationship with a healthy life. TOTAL SCORE: \< 9 low adherence \>= 9 good adherence to the Mediterranean diet
Change in Lipid Profile.2 YEARSChange in LDL cholesterol levels in mg/dL from baseline to follow-up. Unit of Measure: mg/dL
Change in Blood Pressure2 YEARSChange in systolic/diastolic blood pressure (specify how it's measured, e.g., mmHg). Unit of Measure: mmHg.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost Analysis2 YEARSCosts associated with unplanned medical visits, adherence, hospitalizations, and medication adherence. Unit of Measure: Cost (currency)
Healthcare Organization 12 yearsOutcome Measure: Number of unplanned nursing consultations in primary care. Unit of Measure: Number of consultations.
Healthcare Organization 22 yerasOutcome Measure: Number of unplanned family doctor consultations in primary care. Unit of Measure: Number of consultations.
Adherence to Medication2 YEARSAdherence to medication, measured as the proportion of days covered (PDC) based on the total number of days medications were supplied through the electronic prescription system. Unit of Measure: Percentage (%) Calculation of the PDC for a specific drug: The numerator represents the total number of days a drug was supplied between the first and last electronic prescription picked up (a + b + c + d). The denominator represents the total number of days in the interval (from x to t). PDC: proportion of days covered.
Healthcare Organization 42 yerasOutcome Measure: Number of telemedicine hospital consultations. Unit of Measure: Number of consultations.
Healthcare Organization 52 yearsOutcome Measure: Number of in-person hospital consultations. Unit of Measure: Number of consultations.
Lab samples results2 yearsOutcome Measure: Lab samples results. Unit of Measure: Specific measure (e.g., mg/dL for cholesterol).
Healthcare Organization 32 yearsOutcome Measure: Number of attendances at continuous care points in primary care. Unit of Measure: Number of attendances.
Emergency Room Attendances2 YEARSOutcome Measure: Number of hospital emergency attendances during the study period. Unit of Measure: Number of attendances.
Patient Prognosis2 YEARSHospital Admissions Description: Number of hospital admissions related to cardiovascular disease Unit of Measure: Number of admissions Mortality Description: Number of deaths and primary cause during the study period. Unit of Measure: Number of admissions
Change in Patient Risk Factors2 YEARSPhysical Activity Description: Change in physical activity, assessed via a validated questionnaire SF-36 Unit of Measure: Score on the questionnaire. Scale Details: Full Scale Name: Short Form (36) Health Survey Scale Range: The SF-36 scale typically ranges from 0 to 100. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate a better quality of life and health status.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactSERGIO CINZA SANJURJO, PHD MD
scinzas@semergen.es+34915002171
Backup ContactJOSE SEIJAS AMIGO, PhD MS Pharm
jose.seijas.amigo@sergas.es+34981955764

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026