Skip to content

Closed Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Efficacy of Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06421350
Enrollment
32
Registered
2024-05-20
Start date
2024-09-03
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the differences in response to treatment of complex regional pain syndrome with a closed-loop spinal cord stimulator if applied in the early phases (acute or subacute) versus the chronic phase.

Detailed description

After being informed about the study and the potential risks, all patients given written informed consent will be organized into group 1 (acute or subacute) and group 2 (chronic). They will undergo a trial period with a temporary spinal cord stimulator for 7 days. After the trial period, if the provider determines the device improved the patient's pain and function, the permanent device will be implanted. The patient will fill out an outcomes packet at baseline, end of trial period, 3 months and 6 months. There will also be a blood draw to evaluate prolactin levels, which are associated with stress and pain, at baseline, end of trial period, and 3 months.

Interventions

DEVICESpinal Cord Stimulation Device

The closed-loop spinal cord stimulation mechanism uses dynamic adjusting stimulation parameters based on real-time physiologic response and is uniquely positioned to mitigate the aberrant inflammatory and neurosensory processing and autonomic dysfunction driving CRPS and its progression between phases.

Sponsors

Scripps Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years or older * neuromodulation naive patients with unilateral CRPS type 1 or type 2 (defined by Budapest Criteria) * pre-procedure psychological clearance

Exclusion criteria

* younger than 18 years * prior neuromodulation including spinal cord stimulation * prior dorsal root ganglion stimulation * prior peripheral nervous system stimulation * anatomical obstacles to dorsal column lead placement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Severity ScoresBaseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, 6 months(CRPS SS) This will be determined at baseline by the provider based on his diagnosis of the patient's condition, being acute and subacute or chronic. This is based on the presence or absence of 16 clinically-assessed signs and symptoms, and complements the diagnostic criteria for CRPS. A higher score indicates greater severity of the condition. This will be followed up at the 7 day trial period, 3 months and 6 months post procedure by evaluation.
Change in Target Activation Amplitude Levels by the Spinal Cord Stimulation Device7 day trial period, 3 months, and 6 months.Spinal cord stimulation device parameters will be collected to determine if a lower voltage is required to treat acute phase of complex regional pain syndrome as compared to later phases. This will be conducted at follow up visits and analyzed by the medical device representative. The data will be pulled and analyzed to determine the activation point for each patient. This will be captured at the 7 day trial period, 3 months, and 6 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life QuestionnaireBaseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, and 6 months(EQ-5D-5L) Used to capture quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A lower score would indicate a severe score and the patient has a low quality of life. The patient also rates how good or bad their health is on a scale of 0-100, 100 being the best health and 0 being the worst health they could imagine.
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 v 2.1Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, and 6 months(PROMIS-29v2.1) Used to assess pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains: physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance.
General Anxiety Disorder-7Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months and 6 months.(GAD-7) Used for the screening and severity measuring of generalized anxiety disorder. It consists of seven items the patients rate based on their experiences over the past two weeks. Each item is scored from 0 (none) to 3 (every day). The cumulative score, ranging from 0-21, indicates the severity of GAD symptoms, with higher scores corresponding to greater anxiety levels.
Patient Health Questionnaire-9Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, 6 months(PHQ-9) Used for screening and measuring the severity of depression. A higher score would indicate the patient has a worse outcome.
Change in Prolactin LevelsBaseline, 7 day trial period, and 3 monthsWe plan to include a physiological marker of pain response by assessing serum prolactin levels, which are linked to dopamine levels in the brain. We will use prolactin as a convenient marker of abnormal dopamine levels due to chronic pain and the response to spinal cord stimulation treatment as an objective quantifiable metric of success with treatment. We will collect this via blood draw at our lab at baseline, at the 7 day trial period, and 3 months.
Pain Catastrophizing ScaleBaseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, 6 months(PCS) Used to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain among adults with or without chronic pain. A higher score would mean the patient has a worse outcome.
Patient Global Impression of Change7 day trial period, 3 months and 6 months(PGIC) Used to measure the patient's belief about the effectiveness of the treatment. A higher score would reflect the patient believes the treatment is not effective and they have been doing much worse.
Amount of Pain Medication Consumed by PatientBaseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months and 6 monthsUsed to track amount of pain medication taken by the patient on a daily basis or what they are taking and when they are taking it.
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2Baseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, 6 months(SF-MPQ-2) Used to rate the intensity of each type of pain and related symptoms. A higher score means the patient has a worse outcome. They rate their pain and symptoms on a scale of 0-10, with a 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.
Visual Analogue Pain ScaleBaseline, 7 day trial period, 3 months, and 6 months(VAS) This will be used to determine the pain intensity the patient is experiencing. It will be on a scale from 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJulie C McCauley
mccauley.julie@scrippshealth.org585-554-7122
Backup ContactRoslyn M Kackman
kackman.roslyn@scrippshealth.org858-554-7122

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026