Skip to content

Deeper Intubation Make Effects on Cervical Esophageal ESD

A Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Intratracheal Deep Intubation Compared to Traditional Tracheal Intubation in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Esophageal Cancer in the Cervical Esophagus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06420258
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-05-17
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2024-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma in Situ of Cervical Part of Esophagus

Keywords

Deep tracheal intubation, Cervical esophageal cancer, ESD

Brief summary

To compare the efficacy and safety of intratracheal deep intubation with traditional intubation in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer in the cervical esophagus, and to follow up and assess their short-term clinical outcomes.

Detailed description

Forty patients with early esophageal cancer in the cervical esophagus scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection will be included. They will be randomly divided into two groups using sealed envelopes: approximately 20 patients in the intratracheal deep intubation group and 20 patients in the traditional intubation group. By comparing the operation time, perioperative complications, postoperative short-term complications, and other outcomes, we aim to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of deep intubation in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer in the cervical esophagus.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDeeper endotracheal intubation

After general anesthesia, endotracheal intubation was conducted using an ultrafine endoscope (GIF-XP260NS, Olympus Corp., Japan), which allows observation of the exact position and avoids blindness caused by laryngoscopy. To prevent balloon compression of the CE after inflating, the endotracheal intubation tube was inserted above the tracheal carina, roughly the upper thoracic esophagus.

Sponsors

Fujian Provincial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

Each group allocation will be sealed in an opaque envelope with a code written on the outside. These sealed envelopes will be handed over to the researchers. When a study participant meets the inclusion and exclusion criteria upon entry into the study, they will be assigned a number. Subsequently, the corresponding envelope with the assigned number will be opened, and the intervention will be carried out according to the group allocation specified in the envelope. The treatment plan for each research participant will be determined by the generated random sequence.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The lesions mainly involve superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) in the cervical esophagus; 2. There is no evidence of regional lymph node or distant metastasis on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or CT/MRI imaging; 3. Participants have a thorough understanding of this study and voluntarily sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Patients who have received radiotherapy or chemotherapy before endoscopic submucosal dissection surgery; 2. Patients with severe comorbidities who are not suitable for endoscopic submucosal dissection surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the rate of complete resection and postoperative strictureSeven days and three months after ESD procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ESD procedural time and other procedure-related complicationsDuring procedures and just after ESD procedure.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYanqin Xu, MD
454202013@qq.com+86 13599382136
Backup ContactWei Liang, MD
fjsllw@163.com+86 18120888996

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026