Skip to content

Transanal Versus Laparoscopic-assisted Transanal Through in the Management of Hirschsprung's Disease

One Stage Transanal Versus One Stage Laparoscopic-assisted Transanal Endorectal Pull-through in the Management of Hirschsprung's Disease in Pediatric Age Group; A Retrospective Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06419998
Enrollment
70
Registered
2024-05-17
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2024-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hirschprung's Disease, Pediatric Disorder

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the surgical and functional outcomes of pure transanal endorectal pull-through (TAERPT) and laparoscopic-assistance endorectal pull-through (LAERPT) in pediatric patients presented with Hirschsprung's Disease between 3 months and 18 years old. The main questions our study aims to answer are: * Does post-operative continence differs between the two groups? * Does post-operative constipation differs between the two groups? * Does post-operative soiling differs between the two groups * Does post-operative enterocolitis differs between the two groups? * Do post-operative complications differ between the two groups? If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare between pure transanal endorectal pull-through (TAERPT) and laparoscopic-assistance endorectal pull-through (LAERPT) to see if there is a difference in post-operative continence, constipation, soiling, enterocolitis or complications. Participants will be divided into two groups; 40 patients will be treated by TAERPT and included in Group A and 30 patients will be treated by LAERPT and included in Group B.

Detailed description

Introduction: One-stage treatment of endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease could be approached through a complete transanal approach or with the assistance of laparoscopy. Our study aims to compare the surgical and functional outcomes of pure transanal endorectal pull-through (TAERPT) and laparoscopic-assistance endorectal pull-through (LAERPT). Material & methods: This retrospective study included 70 pediatric patients presented with Hirschsprung's Disease to Elshatby University Hospital. 40 patients were treated by TAERPT and included in Group A and 30 patients were treated by LAERPT and included in Group B. The two groups were compared as regards the operative data as well as the post-operative outcomes including the time of passage of stools, time of tolerating oral feeding, the duration of hospital stay, and the development of any early postoperative complications. Also, the number of bowel habits, constipation, enterocolitis, abdominal distension, anastomotic stricture, and continence were assessed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREGroup A: Pure transanal endorectal pull-through (TAERPT)

Patients of Group A will be treated totally by pure transanal endorectal pull-through without the assistance of laparoscopy

PROCEDUREGroup B: Laparoscopic-assistance endorectal pull-through (LAERPT)

Patients of Group B will be treated transanal endorectal pull-through but with the assistance of laparoscopy

Sponsors

Egyptian Biomedical Research Network
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Months to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\* Pediatric patients with age range between 3 months and 18 years old presented with Hirschsprung's Disease who were confirmed to have this condition by contrast enema and/or rectal biopsy.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with previous colostomy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative continenceOne post-operative yearThe two groups will be compared according to post-operative continence whether continent or incontinent by using Abbreviated Baylor Social Continence Scale. the sore ranges from 0 to 24 with the minimum score revealing an excellent result and the highest score revealing the worst result. (Excellent = 0-5, Good = 7-12, Fair = 13-18, Poor = 19-24)
Post-operative constipationOne post-operative yearThe two groups will be compared according to post-operative constipation whether present or not
Post-operative soilingOne post-operative yearThe two groups will be compared according to post-operative soiling whether present or not
Post-operative enterocolitisOne post-operative yearThe two groups will be compared according to post-operative enterocolitis whether present or not
Post-operative complicationsOne post-operative yearThe two groups will be compared according to post-operative complications whether present or not

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026