Health Promotion, Older Adults (65 Years and Older)
Conditions
Keywords
peer education program, nurse, health protection and promotion, Social Cognitive Theory, older adults
Brief summary
This study will be conducted to compare the effects of Peer- and Nurse-Led Health Protection and Promotion Training Programs Based on Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) on the health behaviors of older adults. This research will be carried out in two stages as a mixed-methods study with an embedded mixed-method design. The first stage has been planned as a parallel two-arm non-randomized experimental study. This stage will be conducted between October and December 2025 in two separate elderly homes where older adults are densely located in the Muratpaşa district of Antalya province. The sample size has been calculated as 108 older adults (Intervention-1 Peer Leadership: 54, Intervention-2 Nurse Leadership: 54). In the Intervention-1 group, the intervention will be implemented for 12 weeks through the Health Protection and Promotion Training Program Based on SCT under peer leadership, and the same interventions will be carried out in the Intervention-2 group under nurse leadership. Outcomes will be measured before the intervention and 12 weeks after the intervention using the Elderly Health Promotion Scale, Health Protection and Promotion Behavior Checklist, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Health Seeking Behavior Scale. In the second stage, in order to evaluate the intervention process and experiences multidimensionally, it is aimed to deeply understand the experiences of older adults receiving peer-led intervention, older adults receiving nurse-led intervention, and peer leaders by using multiple data sources within the framework of qualitative research and a phenomenological approach. In the qualitative phase, the data will be collected based on the maximum variation sampling method through face-to-face in-depth individual interviews using semi-structured interview forms in the workshops of both elderly homes in January 2026.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALPeer-Led Health Protection and Promotion Training Program
The Peer-Led Health Protection and Promotion Training Program based on SCT aims to improve health behaviors, increase self-efficacy, and promote appropriate health-seeking behaviors among older adults with low or moderate levels of health promotion practices. Implemented in the Intervention-1 group, this program is defined as the ÖNDER (Self-efficacious Individuals-Qualified Guidance-Experience Sharing-Active Participation-Role Model) Program and was developed according to the Taba-Tyler Model. The program includes interactive group education; demonstration and guided use of Google Fit and E-Pulse applications; WhatsApp groups for peer interaction; peer walking activities; individual phone calls; digital reminders (messages, brochures, videos); peer meetings; and achievement badges. Interventions will be conducted by peer leaders in the workshop classroom and garden of the elderly home.
BEHAVIORALHealth Protection and Promotion Training Program under the Leadership of a Public Health Nurse
The SCT-based Nurse-Led Health Protection and Promotion Training Program implemented in the Intervention-2 Nurse Leadership group has the same aim, duration, and weekly plan as the Intervention-1 Peer Leadership group and is conducted under nurse leadership. The program applied to the Intervention-2 Nurse Leadership group is briefly defined as the REHBER (Reflection-Education-Nurse Leadership-Information-Activation-Routine Formation) Program. The SCT-based Health Protection and Promotion Training Program provided to this group was also developed according to the Taba-Tyler Model.
Sponsors
Akdeniz University
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Older adults aged 65 and over classified as low (for women: 0-4 points; for men: 0-3 points) or moderate (for women: 5-8 points; for men: 4-6 points) according to the Health Promotion and Prevention Behavior Checklist, * Those who attend the elderly center where the study will be conducted at least once a week, * Those who reside in the study province, * Those who have and can use a smartphone, * Those who can speak and understand Turkish, * Those who scored nine or above on the Short Form of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (considered to have sufficient cognitive status to participate in the interview), * Those who scored three or above on the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale (semi-dependent and independent), * Those who agreed to participate in the study voluntarily, * Only one older adult from the same household was included in the study.
Exclusion criteria
• Those who had previously participated in similar studies related to health promotion and prevention were not included in the study. Withdrawal and Loss to Follow-up Criteria * Those who wished to withdraw from the study, * Those who moved to another location outside the study setting, * Those who were hospitalized for more than one week due to various reasons during the study period, * Those who, according to their own statement, had a general health condition not suitable to continue the study, * Those who died during the study period, * Those who completed the pre-test but did not participate in the interventions were excluded from the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Elderly Health Promotion Scale | Change in health promotion behavior assessment score from baseline to week 12 | The Elderly Health Promotion Scale, developed by Wang et al. (2015), assesses health-promoting behaviors in individuals aged 65 and over and consists of 22 items and six subdimensions. Its Turkish validity and reliability were established by Gulsoy and Senturan (2020). The subdimensions include Health Behaviors, Participation in Society, Health Responsibility, Healthy Eating, Regular Exercise, and Oral Health. The four-point Likert scale ranges from "never" (1) to "always" (4), with total scores between 22 and 88; higher scores indicate greater engagement in health-promoting behaviors. Subscale scores are obtained by summing relevant items. Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.80 to 0.91 for subdimensions, with an overall reliability of 0.85 (Gulsoy and Senturan, 2020). |
| Health Promotion and Prevention Behavior Checklist | Change in health promotion and prevention behaviors from baseline to week 12 | This form was developed based on the literature to assess health promotion and prevention behaviors among individuals aged 65 and over (Gulsoy and Senturan, 2020; Ministry of Health, 2023). It includes items on the Elderly Health Promotion Scale, immunization, chronic disease screenings, smoking, obesity, and cancer screenings. Responses are coded as "Yes: 1" and "No: 0." Based on total scores, behaviors are classified as low, moderate, or high, with gender-specific cut-off points. Additionally, health promotion behavior is evaluated as insufficient or sufficient according to the scale score. Content validity was established using the Davis technique with input from 10 experts, yielding a high CVI of 0.96 (Davis, 1992). |
| General Self-Efficacy Scale | Change in general self-efficacy score from baseline to week 12 | The General Self-Efficacy Scale, developed by Jerusalem and Schwarzer and later revised to 10 items, was adapted into Turkish by Aypay (2010). It is a four-point Likert scale (1=not at all true to 4=completely true), with total scores ranging from 10 to 40; higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient is 0.83. |
| Health-Seeking Behavior Scale | Change in health-seeking behavior score from baseline to week 12 | The Health-Seeking Behavior Scale, developed by Kirac and Ozturk (2021), consists of 12 items across three subdimensions: online, professional, and traditional seeking behaviors. It is a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree), where higher mean scores indicate greater health-seeking behavior. The scale's Cronbach's alpha coefficient is 0.76. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Google Fit Mobile Application Use Checklist | Change in Google Fit Mobile Application Use Checklist score from baseline to week 12 | The Google Fit Mobile Application Use Checklist consists of six items assessing the ability to log into the mobile application, start the application while walking, access the average walking duration (daily, weekly, and monthly) through the application, and set walking goals (in terms of duration). The responses to the checklist, which was developed based on the features available in the mobile application, were recorded as "Yes" and "No," and the use of the Google Fit mobile application among older adults was evaluated using an objective measurement tool. |
| E-Pulse Mobile Application Use Checklist | Change in E-Pulse Mobile Application Use Checklist score from baseline to week 12 | The E-Pulse Mobile Application Use Checklist consists of 24 items and was developed based on the features available in the E-pulse mobile application. The responses to this checklist were recorded as "Yes" and "No," and the use of the E-Pulse mobile application among older adults was evaluated using an objective measurement tool. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed