Skip to content

Patients With Type B Aortic Dissection Returning to Work After Discharge:a Cross-sectional Survey

Cross-sectional Survey and Prediction Model Construction of Patients With Type B Aortic Dissection Returning to Work After Discharge

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06418828
Enrollment
178
Registered
2024-05-17
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2024-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Return to Work, Type B Aortic Dissection

Brief summary

This study wants to understand the incidence of returning to work after discharge in patients with type B aortic dissection.

Detailed description

The incidence of aortic dissection in China is increasing year by year. According to the latest research report, the annual incidence of aortic dissection in China is 5 \ 10 / 100,000, the average age of patients is 51.8 years old, and the age of disease is about 10 years younger than that of European and American countries. RTW after discharge is a measure of disease recovery and recovery to normal state. There are only reports on RTW after discharge in the fields of cancer, stroke, organ transplantation, maintenance peritoneal dialysis and so on. Most of the existing literature in the cardiovascular field at home and abroad focuses on assessing the status of RTW and RRTW after discharge. Up to now, there is still a lack of research on the promotion and hindrance factors of RTW in TBAD patients, the status survey of post-RTW work ability and the related nomogram prediction model. Therefore, based on the Meleis transformation theory, this study aims to investigate the current status of return to work of TBAD patients at 6 months after discharge through quantitative and qualitative research, and to explore its influencing factors in depth. Based on the previous results, the RTW visual prediction model of TBAD patients was constructed, which provided a theoretical basis for the formulation and implementation of early intervention by medical staff, and further improved the research in this field.

Interventions

OTHERreturn to work

Ask patients if they are going back to work

Sponsors

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

( 1 ) TBAD was diagnosed by computed tomography angiography ( CTA ) or magnetic resonance angiography ( MRA ) ; ( 2 ) 18 years ≤ age \< 60 years at diagnosis ; ( 3 ) having full-time or part-time job at the time of diagnosis ; ( 4 ) TBAD patients were discharged after successful treatment and the discharge time was ≥ 6 months ;

Exclusion criteria

( 1 ) reaching the retirement age 6 months after discharge ; ( 2 ) those with disturbance of consciousness, mental illness, inability to complete the interview independently or under the guidance of the researcher ; ( 3 ) Participate in other related research ; ( 4 ) Clinical end-stage or receiving palliative treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of return to workSix months after discharge,the incidence of returning to work was calculated according to whether the included patients could return to work.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYanjuan Lin, MD
fjxhyjl@163.com+86 591 8621 8336

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026