Bone Crest of at Least 10 mm Length and 6 mm Width, Partially Edentulous Patients, Patients of at Least 18 Years Old
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate if dynamic-guided surgery is an accurate system for placing dental implants. Researchers will assess the dental implant accuracy of the dynamic guided system compared to the static pilot guide. Participants will: * Receive implant treatment that will be placed by a dynamic or static pilot drill guided system. * Receive post-operative radiological exam for comparative (on the same appointment).
Interventions
DEVICEDental implant placement
Dental implant placement guided by Navident® (ClaroNav Inc., Toronto, Canada)
PROCEDUREStatic guided implant placement
Dental implant placement guided by a stereolithographic pilot drill guide.
Sponsors
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)
Masking description
Due to the nature of the treatment, it is impossible to mask the treatment from the participant and the care provider. However, the data for analysis will be masked to the investigator responsible for assessing the accuracy of each implant placement system.
Intervention model description
Patients who need dental implants and fulfill the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to test group (dynamic guided system) or control group (static stereolithographic pilot drill guided system)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years or older, * ASA type 1 or 2, * Full mouth plaque scores up to 25% (O'LEARY TJ. The plaque control record 1972;43:38), -Partially edentulous with at least one missing tooth * Having a bone crest of at least 10mm in length and 6mm in width.
Exclusion criteria
* medical conditions contraindicating surgery, * untreated periodontal disease or caries * the need for bone augmentation * acute local infections * history of head/neck radiation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implant placement accuracy at the vertical plane. | The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. | Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm. |
| Implant placement accuracy at the implant platform level | The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. | Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm. |
| Implant placement accuracy at the implant apex level | The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. | Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm. |
| Implant placement accuracy at an angular evel | The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. | Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in degrees. |
Countries
Spain
Outcome results
None listed