Personality Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
compassion, metacognition, personality disorder, personality pathology, evolutionary psychopathology
Brief summary
Evolutionary Systems Therapy is a new form of therapy that has been previously tested in a randomized controlled trial and in a few cases of patients diagnosed with Cluster A personality disorders. The objective of the present study is to investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of Evolutionary Systems Therapy in all forms of personality disorders. The study includes three project actions: (i) a case series on adolescents with personality disorders; (ii) a case series on young adults with personality disorders; (iii) an ecological momentary assessment study to confirm the conceptualization model on all the patients.
Detailed description
To explore the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of Evolutionary Systems Therapy, the present study includes three actions. In the first action investigators enroll 6 adolescents (16-19 years) with personality disorders, in the second 15 young adults (20-25 years) with personality disorders. All participants receive 6 months of psychotherapy. The two subsamples of patients (adolescents and young adults) are assessed based on the conceptualization model of Evolutionary Systems Therapy which envisages three macro-organizations of personality (consistently with dimensional and hierarchical models such as Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology): internalizing, externalizing, schizotypal. Investigators plan to recruit patients until the size of the sub-samples is reached (15 young adults divided into 3 groups of 5 patients, each for each of the three interpersonal patterns; 6 adolescents divided into 3 groups of 2 patients, each for each of the three patterns interpersonal). In the third action, an ecological momentary assessment study will investigate the consistency over time between the conceptualization model and the experiences of the young adult patients enrolled: investigators will explore whether the hypothesized conceptualization will be confirmed by collected data on the patients' interpersonal styles.
Interventions
Evolutionary Systems Therapy is an individual form of psychotherapy (talk therapy) that has been previously tested trough a randomized controlled trial and a few cases series, confirming its feasibility and safety.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
All data will be collected in a blinded manner by an assessor other than the therapists. Subsequently, the data will be anonymized and analyzed by a researcher from an institution different from the one in which the study takes place.
Intervention model description
Two individual parallel groups will be recruited: adolescent patients and young adult patients. Both groups will receive a 6-month Evolutionary Systems Therapy treatment. Both groups will access a longitudinal evaluation of the effectiveness of the treatment. All the participants will access a more extensive ecological momentary assessment to evaluate the progress of specific psychopathological mechanisms that are the targets of the treatment. Consistent with the conceptualization model of Evolutionary Systems Therapy and with the scientific literature on dimensional and hierarchical models of psychopathology, this conceptualization will be shared with the patient based on three macro-functionings: externalizing patterns, internalizing patterns, schizotypal patterns.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Being diagnosed with personality pathology in accordance with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 - Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I * Being capable of read and sign the inform consent form
Exclusion criteria
* Being diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and other psychosis * Being diagnosed with bipolar disorders * Being diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder * Being diagnosed with intellectual disability * Being under any psychopharmacological or psychosocial treatment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of individual change in personality pathology over time | 9 measurements: one month before the start of therapy, at the start of therapy, at the end of each of the 6 months of therapy, one month after the end of therapy. | At least 75% rate of change in personality pathology over time as defined by a downward trend in mean of total score of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form) |
| Group change in personality pathology over time | 9 measurements: one month before the start of therapy, at the start of therapy, at the end of each of the 6 months of therapy, one month after the end of therapy. | Group change in personality pathology over time as defined by statistically significant change of sample mean of total score of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form) |
| Feasibility of the intervention | 6 measurements: at the end of each of the six months of therapy | At least 70% rate of completion, adherence, therapeutic alliance and adverse events |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Differential effect of the intervention between interpersonal patterns | 9 measurements: one month before the start of therapy, at the start of therapy, at the end of each of the 6 months of therapy, one month after the end of therapy. | Comparison between efficacy of intervention between three interpersonal patterns (internalizing, antagonistic, schizotypal) as being the target of the intervention. The comparison is aimed to show no statistically significant difference between the three patterns in terms of pre-post change in personality pathology as measured by Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form |
| Specific effect of the intervention between interpersonal patterns | 40 measurements: 20 measurements in the month before surgery (2 measurements per day for the 10 days before the start of therapy) and 20 measurements in the month after surgery (2 measurements per day for the 10 days after the end of therapy) | Comparison between efficacy of intervention between three interpersonal patterns (internalizing, antagonistic, schizotypal) as being the target of the intervention. The comparison is aimed to show no statistically significant difference between the three patterns in terms of pre-post change in personality pathology as measured by Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form. |
| Remission from diagnosis | 2 measurements: one at baseline assessment (once the intervention starts); one at final assessment (6 months after, that is after weekly scheduled 24 sessions) | At least 70% rate of remission from diagnosis of personality pathology |
Countries
Italy