Skip to content

Evolutionary Systems Therapy for Personality Pathology

Evolutionary Systems Therapy for Early Onset of Personality Pathology: A Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Feasibility With Adolescents and Young Adults

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06415812
Acronym
ESTP
Enrollment
21
Registered
2024-05-16
Start date
2023-10-02
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2024-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Personality Disorders

Keywords

compassion, metacognition, personality disorder, personality pathology, evolutionary psychopathology

Brief summary

Evolutionary Systems Therapy is a new form of therapy that has been previously tested in a randomized controlled trial and in a few cases of patients diagnosed with Cluster A personality disorders. The objective of the present study is to investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of Evolutionary Systems Therapy in all forms of personality disorders. The study includes three project actions: (i) a case series on adolescents with personality disorders; (ii) a case series on young adults with personality disorders; (iii) an ecological momentary assessment study to confirm the conceptualization model on all the patients.

Detailed description

To explore the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of Evolutionary Systems Therapy, the present study includes three actions. In the first action investigators enroll 6 adolescents (16-19 years) with personality disorders, in the second 15 young adults (20-25 years) with personality disorders. All participants receive 6 months of psychotherapy. The two subsamples of patients (adolescents and young adults) are assessed based on the conceptualization model of Evolutionary Systems Therapy which envisages three macro-organizations of personality (consistently with dimensional and hierarchical models such as Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology): internalizing, externalizing, schizotypal. Investigators plan to recruit patients until the size of the sub-samples is reached (15 young adults divided into 3 groups of 5 patients, each for each of the three interpersonal patterns; 6 adolescents divided into 3 groups of 2 patients, each for each of the three patterns interpersonal). In the third action, an ecological momentary assessment study will investigate the consistency over time between the conceptualization model and the experiences of the young adult patients enrolled: investigators will explore whether the hypothesized conceptualization will be confirmed by collected data on the patients' interpersonal styles.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEvolutionary Systems Therapy

Evolutionary Systems Therapy is an individual form of psychotherapy (talk therapy) that has been previously tested trough a randomized controlled trial and a few cases series, confirming its feasibility and safety.

Sponsors

Tages Onlus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

All data will be collected in a blinded manner by an assessor other than the therapists. Subsequently, the data will be anonymized and analyzed by a researcher from an institution different from the one in which the study takes place.

Intervention model description

Two individual parallel groups will be recruited: adolescent patients and young adult patients. Both groups will receive a 6-month Evolutionary Systems Therapy treatment. Both groups will access a longitudinal evaluation of the effectiveness of the treatment. All the participants will access a more extensive ecological momentary assessment to evaluate the progress of specific psychopathological mechanisms that are the targets of the treatment. Consistent with the conceptualization model of Evolutionary Systems Therapy and with the scientific literature on dimensional and hierarchical models of psychopathology, this conceptualization will be shared with the patient based on three macro-functionings: externalizing patterns, internalizing patterns, schizotypal patterns.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being diagnosed with personality pathology in accordance with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 - Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I * Being capable of read and sign the inform consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Being diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and other psychosis * Being diagnosed with bipolar disorders * Being diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder * Being diagnosed with intellectual disability * Being under any psychopharmacological or psychosocial treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of individual change in personality pathology over time9 measurements: one month before the start of therapy, at the start of therapy, at the end of each of the 6 months of therapy, one month after the end of therapy.At least 75% rate of change in personality pathology over time as defined by a downward trend in mean of total score of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form)
Group change in personality pathology over time9 measurements: one month before the start of therapy, at the start of therapy, at the end of each of the 6 months of therapy, one month after the end of therapy.Group change in personality pathology over time as defined by statistically significant change of sample mean of total score of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form)
Feasibility of the intervention6 measurements: at the end of each of the six months of therapyAt least 70% rate of completion, adherence, therapeutic alliance and adverse events

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differential effect of the intervention between interpersonal patterns9 measurements: one month before the start of therapy, at the start of therapy, at the end of each of the 6 months of therapy, one month after the end of therapy.Comparison between efficacy of intervention between three interpersonal patterns (internalizing, antagonistic, schizotypal) as being the target of the intervention. The comparison is aimed to show no statistically significant difference between the three patterns in terms of pre-post change in personality pathology as measured by Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form
Specific effect of the intervention between interpersonal patterns40 measurements: 20 measurements in the month before surgery (2 measurements per day for the 10 days before the start of therapy) and 20 measurements in the month after surgery (2 measurements per day for the 10 days after the end of therapy)Comparison between efficacy of intervention between three interpersonal patterns (internalizing, antagonistic, schizotypal) as being the target of the intervention. The comparison is aimed to show no statistically significant difference between the three patterns in terms of pre-post change in personality pathology as measured by Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form.
Remission from diagnosis2 measurements: one at baseline assessment (once the intervention starts); one at final assessment (6 months after, that is after weekly scheduled 24 sessions)At least 70% rate of remission from diagnosis of personality pathology

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactAlessia Saini
alessia.saini@tagesonlus.org+39 055679037

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026