Skip to content

An Implementation Research of Simulation Based Mentorship Program

Implementation and Evaluation of Simulation-Based Mentorship Program (SBMP) in Nepal Using the RE-AIM Framework

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06414629
Acronym
SBMP
Enrollment
326
Registered
2024-05-16
Start date
2020-11-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2024-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Maternal Health, Neonatal Health

Keywords

Simulation, Mentorship, Capacity building

Brief summary

The goal of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation outcomes of the Simulation Based Mentorship Program (SBMP) which was implemented in four districts of Nepal. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What is the reach of the Simulation Based Mentorship Program? 2. What is the effect of Simulation Based Based Mentorship Program on knowledge, clinical skills, and confidence of nurses working in Birthing Centers of four district of Nepal? 3. How was the program adopted by the Birthing Centers? 4. How was the program implemented? 5. What is the perception regarding the maintenance of the program? The nurses working in the Birthing Centers were the study participants, and they received simulation-based monthly mentorship on following seven modules related to essential obstetric and newborn care every month: 1. Infection prevention 2. Antenatal care and counseling 3. Essential care of labor and birth 4. Helping babies breathe 5. Bleeding after birth 6. Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia management 7. Postnatal care and counseling

Detailed description

As the evidence showed gaps in the knowledge and skills of existing maternal and newborn health providers, we designed a Simulation-Based Mentorship Program (SBMP) to bridge the gaps. In this program, local-level mentors were developed to provide regular mentorship using a low-dose high-frequency approach in contrast to one-time coaching in a long gap. This program combined the existing package of the continuum of care along with Helping Babies Survive (HBS) & Helping Mothers Survive (HMS) guidelines, adopting a simulation-based onsite mentoring and coaching approach. The main aim of this mentorship program was to improve the quality of essential obstetric and newborn care provided by the nurses and Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) irrespective of their pre-service and in-service training exposure by identifying gaps, providing regular technical support on the site, building close relationships between mentors and mentees, and increasing communication, backed up by regular practice in simulation labs to help in skill retention. In this mentorship program, mentorship was provided to both the Skilled Birth Assistants (SBAs) and non-Skilled Birth Attendants in their workstations to capacitate them in promoting mother and newborn health outcomes. Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (REAIM) Dimensions in the study were: Reach 1. Number and percentage of Birthing centers intervened in the district 2. Number and percentage of nurses trained as district-level mentors 3. Number and percentage of nurses (and Auxiliary Nurse Midwives) receiving the intervention (simulation-based mentorship) 4. Perception regarding the representativeness of participants in the program Effectiveness 1. Immediate change in knowledge, skills, and confidence (midline results)- compared with control group 2. Perceived reasons for program effectiveness Adoption 1. Number and percentage of intervention sites completing all 6 monthly sessions 2. Number and percentage of mentees participating in all 6 monthly sessions 3. Number and percentage of mentees participating in weekly sessions 4. Reasons for participation/ non-participation Implementation 1. Plan vs. actual implementation (duration between monthly sessions) 2. Perception regarding various components of the program (content, teaching and learning methods, mentors) 3. Challenges encountered during implementation, adaptations made/ mitigation measures adopted Maintenance 1. Number and percentage of mentors and mentees remaining after 4 to 6 months of Simulation Based Mentorship Program (SBMP) implementation (end-line) 2. Retention of knowledge, skills, and confidence 4 to 6 months after completion of the intervention (end-line results) compared with the control group 3. Capital cost and recurrent cost required for continuation at government level 4. Application of learnings in a real setting (during and after the program implementation) 5. Willingness to implement the program in the health facilities of Simulation Based Mentorship Program (SBMP) implemented local levels after completion of the intervention 6. Continuation of mentoring/ learning in the simulation labs/ using manikins after completion of monthly sessions by mentors and mentees 7. Challenges and recommendations for continuation

Interventions

OTHERSimulation Based Mentorship Program

In this program, local level mentors were developed to provide regular mentorship on low-dose high-frequency approach in contrast to one-time coaching in a long gap. This program combined the existing package of the continuum of care along with Helping Babies Survive (HBS) & Helping Mothers Survive (HMS) guidelines, adopting a simulation-based onsite mentoring and coaching approach. The mentors provided monthly mentorship on following seven modules topics to the nurses of the intervention birthing centers: 1. Infection prevention 2. Antenatal care and counseling 3. Essential care of labor and birth 4. Helping babies breathe 5. Bleeding after birth 6. Essential care of labor and birth 7. Postnatal care and counseling Every monthly session was followed by four weekly practice sessions. The nurses from intervention birthing centers were also called mentees.

Sponsors

One Heart Worldwide
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study Birthing Centers were categorized into Intervention Birthing Center and Control Birthing Center

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Nurses working in selected Birthing Centers during the baseline enrollment

Exclusion criteria

* Newly recruited nurses by the Birthing Centers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knowledge, confidence and skills on seven modules1 yearThe knowledge and confidence scores of intervention and control group's nurses in all seven modules were compared before and after the study. However, skills scores of seven modules were measured only in intervention group's nurses. The overall maximum obtainable score was 127 points for knowledge assessment, 210 points for confidence assessment, and 340 points for skills assessment. The scores obtained by the participants were expressed as percentage, and a mean score was calculated for each module. A score of 80% or more was considered to be appropriate. High scores indicated better outcome, and low scores indicated poor outcome.

Countries

Nepal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026