Skip to content

CBD for Knee Osteoarthritis

Sub-Lingual Administration of Cannabidiol for Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06414473
Acronym
SLACK-OA
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-05-16
Start date
2024-06-14
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

Cannabidiol, Osteoarthritis, Pain, Dysfunction, Physical Activity

Brief summary

Osteoarthritis is a disease that affects millions of Americans and is the leading cause of persistent pain and physical disability in the older adult population. Many physically active Americans have reported pain-relieving effects of cannabidiol (CBD) that can reduce or eliminate use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for activity-related pain with minimal to no side effects. Long-term use of over-the-counter medications, including NSAIDs, can pose a significant health risk, and therefore clinical research on the safety and efficacy of CBD is needed.

Detailed description

Knee OA is the most common joint disease and a major cause of functional limitation and pain in adults. Pain is the primary symptom of OA, and the main reason people seek medical treatment. Although pharmacologic treatment for OA such as opioid-based medications may help in the short-term with reducing pain-related symptoms, they are known to have mild to severe side effects along with the potential for long-term dependency. Consequently, many Americans have turned to cannabis-related products like cannabidiol or CBD for reducing pain and pain-related symptoms associated with OA. Current research has shown evidence that phyto-cannabinoids may have a promising therapeutic potential in a variety of physical and psychological ailments, and cannabidiol (CBD) is of particular interest due to its positive safety profile, non-intoxicating effects, and purported therapeutic capabilities in several musculoskeletal diseases. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that CBD administration in the short term is safe and effective in reducing inflammation and pain behaviors in animal models of OA. Despite the widespread popularity of CBD in the US, there is very limited data that indicates the safety, acceptability, and pain-relieving effects of CBD use for people with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. The investigators' objective will be to conduct an early-stage clinical trial to investigate the safety, tolerability/acceptability, and efficacy of CBD as a non-pharmacological treatment for symptomatic knee OA. The investigators will conduct an innovative and novel study with rigorous scientific design that will assess and monitor symptomatic relief and improved function following CBD administration (active) or placebo-control using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study design. The investigators will be recruiting 30 adult men and women, between 40 and 75 years of age, with an established clinical diagnosis of knee OA. To be included in the study, participants must report having moderate to severe knee pain (≥4/10) with physical activity in one or both knees. Subjects will be required to complete a 78-day study trial spanning a pre-dosing screening visit, baseline testing, 30-day dosing regimen with follow-up testing. A 2-week wash-out period will be followed by the cross-over phase using identical baseline and follow-up testing procedures. The data from the active CBD phase will be compared to data from the placebo-control phase. There is an extremely large consumer base for CBD-related products in the US, and this base will be expanding exponentially over the course of this decade; therefore, scientific investigation into its therapeutic potential is necessary.

Interventions

Administered thrice daily (with food) using a sublingual route of administration

DRUGPlacebo

Administered thrice daily (with food) using a sublingual route of administration

Sponsors

University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

All participants, investigators, and study personnel will be blinded to treatment order assignments throughout the study.

Intervention model description

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. established clinical diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) 2. moderate to severe knee pain (≥4/10) with physical activity in one or both knees

Exclusion criteria

1. pregnant (urine pregnancy test) or lactating 2. current cannabis (THC and/or CBD) use (urine drug screen) 3. any prior or ongoing medical condition that, in the investigators' opinion, could adversely affect the safety of the subject 4. any major surgery within 3 months prior to recruitment or planned orthopedic surgery for any time during this study which would interfere with the ability to report pain or quality of life outcome measures 5. any exposure to another investigational drug within 3 months prior to screening 6. BMI ≥ 45 7. current use of any enzyme-modifying drugs, including strong inhibitors or strong inducers of cytochrome P (CYP) enzymes 8. history of: 1. suicidal ideation or self-harm behavior 2. seizure disorder or traumatic brain injury, 3. liver or kidney disease, and 4. cardiovascular diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)Weekly until 1 monthCategorical scale, None or not at all (0) and very severe or very much (4), higher scores mean worse outcome
Theoretical Framework of Acceptability Questionnaire (TFAQ)Baseline and 1 monthLikert scale, 1 and 5, higher scores mean worse outcome
Self-report Ratings of Knee PainBaseline and 1 month, daily until 1 monthNumeric Rating Scale, 0 and 10, higher scores mean worse outcome
Physical ActivityDaily until 1 monthAccelerometer measures step counts per day
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)Baseline and 1 monthCategorical scale, none (0) and extreme (4), higher scores mean worse outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Baseline and 1 monthA set of noninvasive tests used to assess pain sensitivity
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Baseline and 1 monthCategorical scale, Not during the past month to and Three or more times a week, higher scores mean worse outcome
Physical FunctionBaseline and 1 monthTimed Stair-climbing Test (sec)
Fear of Pain Questionnaire III (FPQ III)Baseline and 1 monthLikert scale, 0 and 5, higher scores mean worse outcome
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Baseline and 1 monthLikert scale, 0 and 4, higher scores mean worse outcome
Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale (PASS-20)Baseline and 1 monthLikert scale, 0 and 5, higher scores mean worse outcome

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactPaul A. Borsa, PhD
pborsa@ufl.edu352-294-1726
Backup ContactJohn W Stauffer, MS
johnstauffer@ufl.edu352-294-1777

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026