Arrythmia
Conditions
Brief summary
Comparison of diagnostic Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHuxley Medical
diagnostic
Sponsors
Huxley Medical, Inc.
Study design
Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years of age of older * Able to read, understand, and sign informed consent documentation willing to wear the Sansa device and 3-lead or 5-lead Holter monitor simultaneously for 24- hours * In the opinion of the investigator, subject is willing to comply with the protocol
Exclusion criteria
* Noted deformities of the chest (e.g., pronounced scarring, pectus carinatum) that would Interfere with sensor placement * broken or injured skin that would interfere with sensor placement, are known to experience adverse reactions to medical-grade adhesive * pacemaker dependent * females who are pregnant (self-reported)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comparison of the diagnostic Electrocardiogram (ECG) signal quality of the P, QRS and T wave deflections of the Sansa device to a reference standard Holter monitor | 3 months |
Contacts
Primary ContactJill Fricke
Outcome results
None listed