Skip to content

Urban Gardening and Peer Nutritional Counseling for People With HIV and Food Insecurity

ProMeSA: Urban Gardening and Peer Nutritional Counseling to Improve HIV Care Outcomes Among People With Food Insecurity in the Dominican Republic

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06412016
Acronym
ProMeSA
Enrollment
433
Registered
2024-05-14
Start date
2024-06-14
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2026-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Food Insecurity, HIV

Brief summary

The investigators are conducting a fully powered cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a culturally appropriate, multicomponent intervention combining peer nutritional counseling with urban gardening among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the Dominican Republic (DR) to assess efficacy, analyze mediators of effects, and evaluate detailed process data to inform scale-up. The study will examine the impact of the intervention on participants' HIV clinical outcomes (HIV viral load, antiretroviral therapy adherence, and HIV care retention) as well as intermediate outcomes such as food security and HIV-related stigma.

Detailed description

HIV and food insecurity pose severe and interrelated problems in Latin America and the Caribbean, including in the Dominican Republic (DR), where HIV ranks as one of the top 5 causes of death and our prior studies have found that nearly 70% of people with HIV (PWH) have moderate or severe food insecurity. Despite the established, detrimental role of food insecurity on poor HIV treatment outcomes, evidence on sustainable interventions that address the cycle of food insecurity and poor HIV health is scarce. To address this gap, the investigators developed and piloted Proyecto para Mejorar la Seguridad Alimentaria (ProMeSA or Project to Improve Food Security in English), an integrated urban gardens and peer nutritional counseling intervention, and found it feasible, acceptable, and with preliminary efficacy at 6 and 12 months of improving food security and HIV virologic suppression. The purpose of this 5-year study is to conduct a fully powered cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of ProMeSA to assess intervention efficacy evaluated over a longer period (18 months) as well as mediators and barriers and facilitators to intervention uptake, implementation, and sustainability. The specific aims are: (1) Determine the efficacy of an integrated urban gardens and peer nutritional counseling intervention on the primary outcome of HIV viral suppression \[undetectable HIV viral load (VL)\] and secondary outcomes of antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence and HIV care retention care among people with food insecurity across diverse regions in the DR; (2) Examine the intervention effects on intermediate outcomes posited to mediate the impact of ProMeSA on ART adherence, care retention, and viral suppression; (3) Evaluate process-related factors associated with intervention uptake and implementation (facilitators, barriers, fidelity, and replication costs) to inform future scale-up. The trial will include 20 HIV clinics randomized to intervention or usual care control (n=25 per clinic; \*500 total study participants). VL and other key outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and 6-, 12- and 18-months. Following the investigators' intervention causal framework and pilot findings, they hypothesize that ProMeSA will improve food security and diet quality and reduce stigma and competing needs, which in turn will improve HIV clinical outcomes. The predominant causal paths identified will inform tailoring ProMeSA to enhance impact in future dissemination and implementation. In addition, the investigators will collect extensive quantitative and qualitative data on intervention implementation and participant experiences with the intervention across diverse settings and participants to inform scale-up. The study involves a partnership among researchers from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, University of California, San Francisco, RAND, and the Universidad Autonóma de Santo Domingo as well as the Dominican Ministries of Agriculture and Public Health, the Dominican National HIV/AIDS Council, and the United Nations World Food Program. To the investigators' knowledge, this will be the first full-scale trial to integrate nutritional counseling with food-generating activities among PWH with food insecurity, in support of national and international goals to achieve viral suppression and reduce the disease- and economic burden of HIV. \[\*Update: Because of recruitment challenges at some clinics due to USAID funding cuts and lower detectable viral load, we received NIH approval to reduce sample size to n=433 while retaining similar power\]

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPeer Nutritional Counseling + Urban Gardening

Peer nutritional counseling and urban gardens

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
CollaboratorOTHER
Universidad Autonoma de Santo Domingo
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
CONAVIHSIDA, Republica Dominicana
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ministerio de Agricultura, Republica Dominicana
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ministerio de Salud Publica y Asistencia Social, Republica Dominicana
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
RAND
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Analytic database will not have any indication of intervention or control group assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. registered at one of the 20 HIV clinics in the study; 2. age 18 or older; 3. having initiated ART at least 6 months ago; 4. detectable viral load in the previous 12 months based on medical records and/or evidence of adherence problems (missed clinic visits, delays in picking up antiretrovirals); 5. moderate or severe household food insecurity 6. physically able to plant and maintain an urban garden; stable housing and space for a garden (subjectively assessed by participants after hearing a description of what is involved) 7. planned residency in the local area for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

Does not meet above criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HIV viral loadChange in viral load between baseline and months 6, 12, and 18Change in viral load

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Antiretroviral therapy adherence6, 12 and 18 monthsSelf-reported adherence and objective adherence verified through pharmacy refills
HIV care retention6, 12, and 18 monthsSelf-reported missed clinic visits verified through clinic records

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Food Insecurity6, 12 and 18 monthsSelf-reported food security using the Latin American and Caribbean Food Security Scale to assess household food security over the past 90 days. Scores range from 0 to 15 for households with children (0-8 for households without children) with higher scores meaning worse outcome and are used to classify households into 4 categories: food secure, mild food insecurity, moderate food insecurity and severe food insecurity.
Internalized HIV Stigma6, 12 and 18 monthsSelf-reported internalized stigma will be assessed using an 8-item scale validated previously in the DR. Answers use a 4-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree) assessing agreement with statements measuring negative self-perceptions related to HIV; higher scores indicated worse internalized stigma, range 0-32.
Experienced HIV Stigma (Discrimination)6, 12 and 18 monthsSelf-reported experienced stigma will be assessed using 11 items on reported loss of job, denial of health and other social services, and being verbally harassed or physically abused as a result of living with HIV (with responses of yes/no). This scale been validated in the DR previously and examined both as continuous (range 0-11, with higher scores meaning worse outcome) and dichotomously (any experienced stigma vs. none).

Countries

Dominican Republic

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026