Skip to content

Block and Periarticular Injection Study

The Effect of Regional Anesthesia and Periarticular Injection and Versus Periarticular Injection Alone on Early Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06410612
Enrollment
160
Registered
2024-05-13
Start date
2024-03-04
Completion date
2025-05-12
Last updated
2025-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare two types of perioperative analgesic modalities, adductor canal block plus interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block and periarticular injection versus periarticular injection alone, to determine their relative efficacies with regard to pain relief and functional outcomes in the early postoperative period following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Detailed description

The widespread adoption of multimodal analgesia in contemporary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to improvements in perioperative pain control, expedited recovery times, and shorter hospital stays1-3. Periarticular injections (PAIs), adductor canal blocks (ACBs), and interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) blocks are commonly utilized as part of contemporary multimodal analgesia protocols, but their relative efficacies in improving early recovery after TKA has yet to be definitively elucidated4. There are a few known potential drawbacks of ACBs and IPACKs including surgical delay due to administration timing, increased costs, and small risks associated with a regional block. Both regional anesthesia and PAI have been found to be effective alone in improving pain and opioid consumption, but there is limited data on whether there is an additive benefit of providing both treatments for patients undergoing primary TKA. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to compare the efficacy of regional anesthesia and PAI vs. PAI alone for pain management and functional recovery in the early postoperative period following TKA. Design Prospective randomized trial Treatment Groups All ACBs will be administered as a single shot preoperatively in the holding area on the day of surgery by the regional anesthesia team and PAIs will be administered intraoperatively by the treating orthopaedic surgeon. Group 1: regional anesthesia (ACB + IPACK) and PAI Group 2: PAI alone

Interventions

DRUGPAI

this is the no block portion of the study

DRUGregional anesthesia and PAI

this is the block portion of the study

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

patients will not know which group they are in

Intervention model description

patients will be randomized into 2 groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Planning to undergo Unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty. * 18 and up * Willing to sign informed consent * Willing to return for all follow-up visits * Smartphone or tablet device capable of running the FocusMotion platform

Exclusion criteria

* BMI \> 45 * Preexisting functionally limiting neurologic disorders * Hepatic or renal insufficiency * History of unprovoked venous thromboembolism * Inability to complete baseline functional testing * Chronic opioid or gabapentin and pregabalin use (chronic defined as use \>5 days per week prior to the surgical procedure) * Allergy or intolerance to trial medications * Planned admission to a postoperative rehabilitation facility * Planned general anesthesia * Receiving workers compensation or disability payments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score for 2 weeks postoperativelyat 2 weekspain score 0-10 10 being more pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
daily opioid consumptiondaily up to 2 weeks postopopioid medications survey
daily resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scoredaily up to 2 weeks postopPain score survey 0-10, 10 being more pain
daily step countdaily up to 2 weeks postopstep count throught fitbit
length of staypostop day 1in hospital stay
complications14 days postopNumber of participants with complications such as revision, infection, etc
knee range of motiondaily through app and knee brace up to 2 weeks postoprange of motion daily through app exercises
Oxford knee scoreweekly up to 2 weeks postopoxford knee survey through app, 0-48 scale 0 being min and 48 being max
sleep qualitydaily up to 2 weeks postopsleep quality through app surveys and fitbit data

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026