Skip to content

A Novel Suturing Technique of Cystocele Treatment

A Novel Suturing Technique for Natural Tissue Repair in Cystocele Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06410469
Acronym
cystosel
Enrollment
65
Registered
2024-05-13
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
2023-09-15
Last updated
2024-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystocele

Keywords

anterior colporraphy, naturel tissue, suture technique

Brief summary

The rug weaving-like plication technique may offer a viable alternative for cystocele repair without mesh, utilizing natural tissue.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to compare patients who underwent cystocele repair using the rug weaving plication technique, a natural tissue repair method implemented since 2022 for anterior prolapse, with those treated using conventional techniques. The investigators retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent anterior vaginal wall repair with the rug weaving-like plication technique and 32 patients who underwent surgery using conventional colporrhaphy. The investigators recorded demographic data and operative details of the patients. At the 6-month postoperative follow-up,the investigators assessed patients' complaints, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q), Modified Oxford Scoring (MOS), and pelvic floor muscle strength. The investigators measured bladder wall thickness between the bladder and anterior vaginal wall using Transvaginal Ultrasonography (USG) and compared demographic data, operative details, and postoperative outcomes between the two groups.

Interventions

anterior vaginal wall repair with the rug weaving-like plication technique in cystosel

Sponsors

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Patients operated on using the rug weaving plication technique

Exclusion criteria

Patients operated on using the conventional anterior colporrhaphy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q)Maximum 6 monthsPostoperative anterior wall POP-Q Measurements were conducted with a scaled abeslang while the patient was in the lithotomy position. Evaluation of the anterior compartment involved measuring points Aa and Ba, the apical compartment involved points C and D, and the posterior compartment involved points Ap and Bp. Staging was determined based on the lowest point of prolapse. Stage 0 indicated normal pelvic floor support, Stage 2 indicated a distance between -1 and 1 from the hymen, and Stage 4 indicated total uterine prolapse (prosidentia). Stages 1,2 and 3 indicated intermediary levels of prolapse severity, counting for grades between Stage 0 and 4.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bladder thicknessMaximum 6 monthsPostoperative bladder thickness:Bladder wall thickness between the bladder and anterior vaginal wall was measured using transvaginal ultrasonography and recorded in millimeters

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026