Skip to content

Safety and Modulation of Adaptive Immunity by Iscador® Qu Viscum Album Extract in Patients With Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Cancers Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Safety and Modulation of Adaptive Immunity by Iscador® Qu Viscum Album Extract in Patients With Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Cancers Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - a Randomized Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06408688
Acronym
ISCA-CHECK
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-05-10
Start date
2024-06-24
Completion date
2026-11-30
Last updated
2024-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Solid Tumor

Keywords

Mistletoe Extract

Brief summary

The main objective of this study is to test if adding the mistletoe extract Iscador® Qu to regular cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors affects: * The immune system's ability to fight cancer * Safety of the treatment * How well the treatment performs against cancer * How the patient feels during treatment Researchers will compare patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus Iscador® Qu with patients treated with imune checkpoint inhibitors only.

Detailed description

The impact of mistletoe preparations - that are claimed to have immunostimulatory properties - on cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors remains unclear. To address this knowledge gap, the current study aims to investigate the modulation of adaptive immunity through the combination of Iscador (a specific mistletoe preparation) and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Additionally, researchers will evaluate the safety profile of this combination therapy in patients with locally advanced non-operable or metastatic cancers except for skin cancers. By examining the modulation of adaptive immunity and safety of this treatment approach, researchers aim to provide valuable insights for clinicians and patients in the context of advanced cancer care.

Interventions

DRUGImmune checkpoint inhibitors plus Iscador® Qu.

Standard cancer treatment plus subcutaneous injection of mistletoe fermented extract (Iscador® Qu) as per the summary of product characteristics.

DRUGImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Standard cancer treatment.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Locally advanced non-operable or metastatic solid tumor, except for skin cancer * Eligible for routine (standard) treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor (+/- chemo/targeted therapy) as per the discretion of the local investigator * Subjects must be eligible for treatment with mistletoe preparations (controlled brain metastases, prednisolone equivalent below 10mg, no known hypersensitivity) * ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status score of 0-2 * Males and Females at least 18 years of age; no subjects under tutelage * No previous mistletoe treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to Iscador® Qu or immune checkpoint inhibitors, e.g. hypersensitivity, active autoimmune disorder * Patients with skin cancer * Participation in another study with investigational drug within 30 days prior to enrolment (participation in observational studies or diagnostic studies without a particular drug intervention are allowed) * Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients with a relative increase in T cell richness or diversity of 20% or morebaseline and 12 weeks (+/- 2 weeks)Percentage of patients with a relative increase in T cell richness or diversity of 20% or more as measured by peripheral blood T cell receptor Next-generation sequencing.
Percentage of patients with a relative decrease in T cell clonality of 20% or morebaseline and 12 weeks (+/- 2 weeks)Percentage of patients with a relative decrease in T cell clonality of 20% or more as measured by peripheral blood T cell receptor Next-generation sequencing.
Level of T cell richnessbaseline and 12 weeks (+/- 2 weeks)Level of T cell richness as measured by peripheral blood T cell receptor Next-generation sequencing.
Level of T cell diversitybaseline and 12 weeks (+/- 2 weeks)Level of T cell diversity as measured by peripheral blood T cell receptor Next-generation sequencing.
Level of T cell clonalitybaseline and 12 weeks (+/- 2 weeks)Level of T cell clonality as measured by peripheral blood T cell receptor Next-generation sequencing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety and tolerability according to the NCI CTC AE v5up to 18 weeksSafety and tolerability according to the NCI CTC AE v5 (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events)
EORTC QLQ C30up to 24 monthsQuality of life as measured by EORTC QLQ C30 (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire). Calculation of the scores follows the validated formulas as issued by the EORTC. Scores range from 0% to 100% for all questionnaire domains with higher values representing better outcome.
Rate of early immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatment terminationup to 24 monthsRate of early immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatment termination
Best tumor responseup to 24 monthsBest tumor response as per investigators assessment
Progression-free survivalup to 24 monthsInvestigator-assessed progression-free survival
Overall survivalup to 24 monthsOverall survival

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactMascha Binder, Prof. Dr.
mascha.binder@unibas.ch+41 61 265 50 75
Backup ContactBenjamin Kasenda, PD Dr. Dr.
Benjamin.Kasenda@usb.ch+41 61 265 50 75

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026