Skip to content

The Effect of Endotracheal Tube With Stylet in Morbidly Obese Patients

Comparison of Using an Endotracheal Tube With Stylet Versus an Endotracheal Tube Alone in Morbidly Obese Patients

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06405672
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-05-08
Start date
2024-04-30
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2024-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation; Difficult or Failed, Obesity, Morbid

Keywords

different intubation techniques, endotracheal tube, obesity, stylet

Brief summary

The investigators aimed to compare the effects of using enotracheal tube with stylet versus endotracheal tube alone in morbidly obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.

Detailed description

Different intubation techniques have been used in morbidly obese patients undergoing general anesthesia. No study comparing the use of endotracheal tube with or without stylet was found in literature. Thus, the investigators aimed to compare the effects of using enotracheal tube with stylet versus endotracheal tube alone in morbidly obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.

Interventions

The obese patients who will be intubated with stylet in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

The obese patients who will be intubated without stylet in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Sponsors

Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Body mass index over 30 ASA physical status I-III Undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy -

Exclusion criteria

Body mass index under 30 ASA physical status IV Unable to cooperate Refused to give writtten informed consent-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation timethrough study completion, an average of 6 monthsfrom handling laryngoscope to first vision of end-tidal CO2 waveform

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation successthrough study completion, an average of 6 monthssuccess or failure of first intubation attempt
complicationsthrough study completion, an average of 6 monthsUndesirable complications such as laryngospazm, hoarseness will be recorded at postoperative period

Contacts

Primary ContactKerem İnanoğlu, MD
kinanoglu@yahoo.com+902422494400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026