Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Single Versus Multi-Shade Direct Composite Resin Veneers

Clinical Evaluation of Single Versus Multi-Shade Direct Composite Resin Veneers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06404398
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-05-08
Start date
2022-07-19
Completion date
2024-04-09
Last updated
2024-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Discoloration

Keywords

OMNICHROMA, Veneers, USPHS criteria

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to clinically evaluate single and multi-shade direct veneers.

Detailed description

The use of direct, light-activated resin composites in esthetic restorative dentistry has grown dramatically in response to growing needs. Recent developments have resulted in the creation of restorative materials and methods that, particularly in the anterior area, attempt to restore the natural appearance of the teeth. Numerous clinical conditions, including tooth discolorations, severe fractures, misaligned teeth, and dental caries lesions, can significantly affect smile harmony and esthetic appearance, which can lower quality of life. Modern cosmetic dentistry began with the introduction of laminate veneers in the 1970s, which combined the ideas of tooth conservation and aesthetics. Because laminate veneers (LVs) offer the potential to satisfy the need for extremely beautiful, minimally invasive, long-lasting restorations with superior clinical performance, they have gained popularity as a treatment option. Direct composite veneering preserves natural tooth structure, may be completed chairside, doesn't require repeated appointments, doesn't require luting agents, is minimally invasive, readily repaired, and is less expensive because there are no laboratory fees. Furthermore, their abrasion rates are comparable to those of real tooth structures.

Interventions

OTHEROMNICHROMA, Ceram. x spectra

Each patient had two types of veneers.

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This clinical study was double-blind study as the evaluators who were not included in the restorative procedures and the patients were blinded to tested groups, but the operator wasn't blinded to these groups

Intervention model description

randomized controlled clinical study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Good hygiene. * Vital discolored anterior teeth

Exclusion criteria

* severe discoloration * Para functional activities * Non-vital teeth. * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
assess single and multi-shade direct composite resin veneers18 months evaluation periodsTwo evaluators assessed the restorations based on modified United States Public Health Service criteria. Score(0) represents ideal clinical scenario, Score(1) acceptable, Score (2) satisfactory, and Score(3) and Score (4) considered clinically unsatisfactory

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026