Skip to content

Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in NORA

The Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil on Sedation and Comfort in Non-Operating Room Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06403670
Enrollment
76
Registered
2024-05-08
Start date
2022-12-17
Completion date
2024-04-30
Last updated
2024-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Comparison of the Effects of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine

Brief summary

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure is frequently encountered in non-operating room anesthesia applications (NORA). It is a procedure that requires deep sedation and analgesia in terms of gastroenterologist and patient comfort. Dexmedetomidine, which is increasingly used in NORA applications, comes to the fore because it does not cause respiratory depression, reduces the stress response, and provides hemodynamic stability. This study aims to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine-propofol (DP) and remifentanil-propofol (RP) combinations on hemodynamic stability, rapid recovery, and patient comfort in patients who underwent ERCP.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine

Group DP received 0.5 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine IV for 30 seconds, then dexmedetomidine infusion was started at 0.1-0.7 mcg/kg/h. Propofol 1 mg/kg was administered after waiting for 5 minutes for adequate sedation to develop due to dexmedetomidine's delayed onset of action.

DRUGRemifentanil

Group RP received remifentanil 0.1 mcg/kg intravenously for 30 seconds, then remifentanil infusion was started at 0.01-0.1 mcg/kg/min. After waiting 2 minutes to develop a sufficient sedation level, 1 mg/kg of propofol was given.

Sponsors

Baskent University Ankara Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-ASA 1-3

Exclusion criteria

* Neurological disease, * Psychiatric disease, * Coronary artery disease, * Long-term sedative drug use, * Pregnant patients, * Known allergy to planned drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Agitation-Sedation0 and 5 minutes after ERCP endsIt will be evaluated with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale.
Hemodynamic stability5, 10, 15, 25, 35. minutesMean arterial pressure with non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (mmHg)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient comfort30 minutes after ERCP endsIt will be evaluated by nausea-vomiting and survey.
Rapid recovery30 minutes after ERCP endsIt will be evaluated with a Modified Aldrete Score.
Minimize drug dose5, 10, 15, 25, 35. minutesAmounts of medication administered throughout the procedure period will be collected.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026