Skip to content

Bioresorbable Glass Fiber Matrix in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of a Borate-based Bioactive Glass Advanced Wound Matrix and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06403605
Enrollment
148
Registered
2024-05-08
Start date
2022-09-13
Completion date
2025-01-17
Last updated
2025-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot, Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Ulcer Foot

Keywords

DFU, Ulcer

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial designed to collect patient outcome data on 2 commercially available treatments for diabetic foot wounds.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective, multi-center, RCT designed to collect patient outcome data on two commercially available treatments for DFUs. The trial will be single blinded in regard to wound healing assessment (another clinician, other than the investigator at each site will assess wound healing) and confirmation of wound healing will be overseen by an independent adjudication committee made up of wound care experts. The study will last twelve weeks, with a two week screening period prior to enrollment. There are two arms in the study: Arm 1: SOC therapy (offloading of the DFU (CAM boots or total contact casting \[TCC\] if the subject's foot is too large for a CAM), appropriate sharp or surgical debridement, infection management (systemic antibiotics only in conjunction with debridement)) and wound care covering with resorbable bioactive glass fiber, MIRRAGEN™ Advanced Wound Matrix, followed by a padded 3-layer dressing comprised of 4x4 gauze pads, soft roll and compressive wrap (DynaflexTM or equivalent). ARM 2: SOC therapy (offloading of the DFU (CAM boots or total contact casting \[TCC\] if the subject's foot is too large for a CAM), appropriate sharp or surgical debridement, infection management (systemic antibiotics only in conjunction with debridement)) and wound care covering with calcium alginate Fibracol dressing follwed by a padded 3-layer dressing comprised of 4x4 gauze pads, soft roll and compressive wrap (DynaflexTM or equivalent).

Interventions

DEVICEMirragen Advanced Wound Matrix

Offloading - patient will be offloaded in a diabetic CAM boot after treatment, or total contact cast if patient cannot be fit in a diabetic boot. Other names; pressure relief. Additional outer dressing application - application of outer moisture retentive dressing, and a multilayer compression dressing. Other names; outer protective dressing. Mirragen Advanced Wound Matrix - application of Mirragen to wound site along with standard of care treatment.

DEVICEFibracol

Offloading - patient will be offloaded in a diabetic CAM boot after treatment, or total contact cast if patient cannot be fit in a diabetic boot. Other names; pressure relief. Additional outer dressing application - application of outer moisture retentive dressing, and a multilayer compression dressing. Other names; outer protective dressing. Fibracol - application of Fibracol to wound site along with standard of care treatment.

Sponsors

Professional Education and Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
ETS Wound Care, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects must be at least 18 years of age or older. 2. Subjects must have a diagnosis of type 1 or 2 Diabetes mellitus. 3. At randomization subjects must have a target diabetic foot ulcer with a minimum surface area of 1.0 cm2 and a maximum surface area of 20.0 cm2 measured post debridement with a photographic planimetry app. 4. The target ulcer must have been present for a minimum of 4 weeks and a maximum of 52 weeks of standard of care prior to the initial screening visit. 5. The target ulcer must be located on the foot with at least 50% of the ulcer below the malleolus. 6. The target ulcer must be full thickness on the foot or ankle that does not probe to bone. 7. Adequate circulation to the affected foot as documented by any of the following methods performed within 3 months of the first screening visit: 1. TCOM ≥30 mmHg 2. ABI between 0.7 and 1.3 3. PVR: Biphasic 4. TBI ˃0.6 5. As an alternative arterial Doppler ultrasound can be performed evaluating for biphasic dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial vessels at the level of the ankle 8. If the subject has two or more ulcers, they must be separated by at least 2 cm. The largest ulcer satisfying the inclusion and

Exclusion criteria

will be designated as the target ulcer. 9. Target ulcers located on the plantar aspect of the foot must be offloaded for at least 14 days prior to randomization. 10. The subject must consent to using the prescribed off-loading method for the duration of the study. 11. The subject must agree to attend the weekly study visits required by the protocol. 12. The subject must be willing and able to participate in the informed consent process.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Wound Healing12 weeksThe proportion of subjects achieving complete wound closure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Area Reduction (PAR)12 weeksPercentage wound area reduction measured weekly with digital photographic planimetry and physical examination
Time to Heal12 weeksThe time to achieve complete wound closure within 12 weeks.
Changes in Quality of Life12 weeksThe WOUND-Q is a questionnaire measuring outcomes important to patients with chronic wounds. Five of the tool's 13 independently functioning scales (with 5 to 11 items each) were measured in this study. 'Assessment' measures how concerned someone has been with their wound(s). 'Drainage' measures how bothered someone has been by drainage from their wound(s). 'Smell' measures how bothered someone has been by the smell from their wound(s). 'Social' measures the impact of a person's wound(s) on their social life. 'Dressing' measures someone's satisfaction with their wound dressing. For all of these scales, possible responses to each item range from minimum 0 ('not at all') to maximum 4 ('very much'). To score a scale, the raw scores for the set of items in a scale are added together to produce a total raw score. The total raw score for the scale is then converted to a score that ranges from 0 to 100. For all, higher scores represent better outcomes.
Change in Pain Level12 weeksThe FACES pain scale was administered to the clinical trial participants at each visit. The trial participant selected their pain level with a series of faces that correspond to a number between 0 which implies no pain, up to 10 which implies the most severe pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

245 subjects were assessed for eligibility to participate in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SOC Primary Dressing With MIRRAGEN™
Mirragen Advanced Wound Matrix is intended for the use in the management of wounds including diabetic ulcers. Wound matrix to be used per manufacturer instructions for use in conjunction with offloading and additional (outer) dressing application with moisture retention dressing.
67
SOC Primary Dressing With FIBRACOL™
A commercially available wound dressing to be used per manufacturer's instructions for use in conjunction with offloading and additional (outer) dressing application with moisture retention dressing.
66
Total133

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow-upAdverse Event42
Follow-upDeath10
Follow-upLost to Follow-up10
Follow-upOther reasons04
Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject23
Follow-upWithdrawn per protocol with PAR <50% at week 61719

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSOC Primary Dressing With FIBRACOL™TotalSOC Primary Dressing With MIRRAGEN™
Age, Continuous
mITT
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.26
59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.81
Age, Continuous
PP
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.95
60.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.34
Age when first DFU appeared
mITT
53.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.76
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.56
Age when first DFU appeared
PP
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.09
56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.66
58.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.86
BMI
mITT
35.0 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.98
34.5 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.71
33.9 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.45
BMI
PP
36.4 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.99
35.3 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
34.3 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.06
Comorbidities: any psychiatric condition
mITT
22 Participants39 Participants17 Participants
Comorbidities: any psychiatric condition
PP
13 Participants26 Participants13 Participants
Comorbidities: chronic heart failure (CHF)
mITT
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Comorbidities: chronic heart failure (CHF)
PP
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Comorbidities: chronic kidney disease (CKD)
mITT
11 Participants15 Participants4 Participants
Comorbidities: chronic kidney disease (CKD)
PP
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Comorbidities: gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
mITT
17 Participants30 Participants13 Participants
Comorbidities: gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
PP
7 Participants18 Participants11 Participants
Comorbidities: hyperlipidemia / dyslipidemia
mITT
24 Participants44 Participants20 Participants
Comorbidities: hyperlipidemia / dyslipidemia
PP
11 Participants25 Participants14 Participants
Comorbidities: hypertension
mITT
49 Participants90 Participants41 Participants
Comorbidities: hypertension
PP
25 Participants50 Participants25 Participants
Comorbidities: hypothyroidism
mITT
11 Participants20 Participants9 Participants
Comorbidities: hypothyroidism
PP
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Comorbidities: lower extremity edema
mITT
6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Comorbidities: lower extremity edema
PP
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Comorbidities: peripheral arterial disease (PAD) / peripheral vascular disease (PVD)
mITT
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Comorbidities: peripheral arterial disease (PAD) / peripheral vascular disease (PVD)
PP
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Comorbidities: peripheral neuropathy
mITT
34 Participants61 Participants27 Participants
Comorbidities: peripheral neuropathy
PP
17 Participants36 Participants19 Participants
Creatinine
mITT
1.24 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.54
1.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.49
1.09 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.42
Creatinine
PP
1.19 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.46
1.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.46
1.09 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.46
Diabetes duration
mITT
15.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.58
16.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.71
17.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.59
Diabetes duration
PP
16.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.18
16.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.93
15.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.75
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
mITT
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants33 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
mITT
Not Hispanic or Latino
52 Participants100 Participants48 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
mITT
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
PP
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
PP
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants63 Participants34 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
PP
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
HbA1c
mITT
7.4 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.65
7.6 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.67
7.7 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.69
HbA1c
PP
7.4 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.57
7.6 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
7.7 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61
History of DFU recurrence
mITT
31 Participants63 Participants32 Participants
History of DFU recurrence
PP
16 Participants34 Participants18 Participants
Major amputation
mITT
5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Major amputation
PP
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Major foot deformities
mITT
Cavus foot
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Major foot deformities
mITT
Charcot
8 Participants13 Participants5 Participants
Major foot deformities
mITT
Hallux valgis
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Major foot deformities
mITT
Hammertoe
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Major foot deformities
mITT
None of the above
55 Participants109 Participants54 Participants
Major foot deformities
mITT
Varus ankle
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Major foot deformities
PP
Cavus foot
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Major foot deformities
PP
Charcot
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Major foot deformities
PP
Hallux valgis
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Major foot deformities
PP
Hammertoe
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Major foot deformities
PP
None of the above
31 Participants69 Participants38 Participants
Major foot deformities
PP
Varus ankle
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Minor amputations
mITT
0
37 Participants78 Participants41 Participants
Minor amputations
mITT
1
14 Participants25 Participants11 Participants
Minor amputations
mITT
2
7 Participants12 Participants5 Participants
Minor amputations
mITT
3 or more
8 Participants18 Participants10 Participants
Minor amputations
PP
0
21 Participants52 Participants31 Participants
Minor amputations
PP
1
10 Participants16 Participants6 Participants
Minor amputations
PP
2
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Minor amputations
PP
3 or more
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Number of comorbidities
mITT
7.9 comorbidities
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.29
7.5 comorbidities
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.92
7.1 comorbidities
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.48
Number of comorbidities
PP
8.0 comorbidities
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.32
7.1 comorbidities
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.47
6.3 comorbidities
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
Number of debridements
mITT
9.2 debridements
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.34
9.1 debridements
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.43
9.0 debridements
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.54
Number of debridements
PP
9.7 debridements
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.85
9.6 debridements
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.96
9.4 debridements
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.09
Number of other concurrent DFUs at screening
mITT
0
53 Participants101 Participants48 Participants
Number of other concurrent DFUs at screening
mITT
1
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Number of other concurrent DFUs at screening
mITT
2
9 Participants24 Participants15 Participants
Number of other concurrent DFUs at screening
mITT
3 or more
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Number of other concurrent DFUs at screening
PP
0
29 Participants61 Participants32 Participants
Number of other concurrent DFUs at screening
PP
1
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of other concurrent DFUs at screening
PP
2
7 Participants18 Participants11 Participants
Number of other concurrent DFUs at screening
PP
3 or more
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
mITT
Ankle
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
mITT
Forefoot
24 Participants53 Participants29 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
mITT
Heel
10 Participants19 Participants9 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
mITT
Hindfoot
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
mITT
Midfoot
17 Participants29 Participants12 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
mITT
Toe
10 Participants23 Participants13 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
PP
Ankle
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
PP
Forefoot
15 Participants33 Participants18 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
PP
Heel
6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
PP
Hindfoot
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
PP
Midfoot
7 Participants12 Participants5 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each anatomical location
PP
Toe
6 Participants19 Participants13 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each position
mITT
Lateral
28 Participants60 Participants32 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each position
mITT
Medial
37 Participants72 Participants35 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each position
mITT
Unknown
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each position
PP
Lateral
17 Participants35 Participants18 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each position
PP
Medial
20 Participants46 Participants26 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each position
PP
Unknown
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each vertical location
mITT
Dorsal
12 Participants27 Participants15 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each vertical location
mITT
Plantar
54 Participants106 Participants52 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each vertical location
PP
Dorsal
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Number of participants with index wound in each vertical location
PP
Plantar
29 Participants63 Participants34 Participants
Number of prior DFUs
mITT
4.4 DFUs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.96
3.8 DFUs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.66
3.1 DFUs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.27
Number of prior DFUs
PP
3.6 DFUs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.77
3.0 DFUs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.38
2.5 DFUs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.95
Off-loading type
mITT
Boot
11 Participants21 Participants10 Participants
Off-loading type
mITT
CAM boot
31 Participants59 Participants28 Participants
Off-loading type
mITT
No off-loading
13 Participants27 Participants14 Participants
Off-loading type
mITT
Other
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Off-loading type
mITT
Shoe
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Off-loading type
PP
Boot
10 Participants16 Participants6 Participants
Off-loading type
PP
CAM boot
14 Participants35 Participants21 Participants
Off-loading type
PP
No off-loading
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Off-loading type
PP
Other
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Off-loading type
PP
Shoe
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
mITT
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
mITT
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
mITT
Black or African American
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
mITT
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
mITT
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
mITT
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
mITT
White
60 Participants117 Participants57 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
Black or African American
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
PP
White
34 Participants71 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
mITT
Female
18 Participants38 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
mITT
Male
48 Participants95 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
PP
Female
9 Participants20 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
PP
Male
29 Participants62 Participants33 Participants
Tobacco use
mITT
Current
8 Participants21 Participants13 Participants
Tobacco use
mITT
Former
22 Participants42 Participants20 Participants
Tobacco use
mITT
Never used tobacco
36 Participants70 Participants34 Participants
Tobacco use
PP
Current
4 Participants12 Participants8 Participants
Tobacco use
PP
Former
15 Participants28 Participants13 Participants
Tobacco use
PP
Never used tobacco
19 Participants42 Participants23 Participants
Wound age
mITT
20.9 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.82
20.9 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
20.9 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.26
Wound age
PP
21.3 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.55
20.3 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.69
19.4 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.99
Wound area
mITT
3.3 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.57
3.2 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.69
3.1 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.81
Wound area
PP
3.1 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.43
2.9 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.39
2.7 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.37

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 670 / 66
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 675 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 673 / 66

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Wound Healing

The proportion of subjects achieving complete wound closure.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Both the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis populations are represented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Complete Wound HealingmITT32 Participants
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Complete Wound HealingPP32 Participants
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Complete Wound HealingmITT16 Participants
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Complete Wound HealingPP16 Participants
p-value: 0.007Fisher Exact
Secondary

Change in Pain Level

The FACES pain scale was administered to the clinical trial participants at each visit. The trial participant selected their pain level with a series of faces that correspond to a number between 0 which implies no pain, up to 10 which implies the most severe pain.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Both the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis populations are represented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Change in Pain LevelmITT0.5 score change [EOS - baseline]Standard Deviation 2.47
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Change in Pain LevelPP0.9 score change [EOS - baseline]Standard Deviation 2.24
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Change in Pain LevelmITT0.8 score change [EOS - baseline]Standard Deviation 2.27
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Change in Pain LevelPP1.0 score change [EOS - baseline]Standard Deviation 2.44
Secondary

Changes in Quality of Life

The WOUND-Q is a questionnaire measuring outcomes important to patients with chronic wounds. Five of the tool's 13 independently functioning scales (with 5 to 11 items each) were measured in this study. 'Assessment' measures how concerned someone has been with their wound(s). 'Drainage' measures how bothered someone has been by drainage from their wound(s). 'Smell' measures how bothered someone has been by the smell from their wound(s). 'Social' measures the impact of a person's wound(s) on their social life. 'Dressing' measures someone's satisfaction with their wound dressing. For all of these scales, possible responses to each item range from minimum 0 ('not at all') to maximum 4 ('very much'). To score a scale, the raw scores for the set of items in a scale are added together to produce a total raw score. The total raw score for the scale is then converted to a score that ranges from 0 to 100. For all, higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Both the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis populations are represented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Changes in Quality of LifeAssessment (PP)28.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.89
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Changes in Quality of LifeDrainage (mITT)16.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.77
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Changes in Quality of LifeDrainage (PP)25.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.58
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Changes in Quality of LifeSocial (mITT)11.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.14
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Changes in Quality of LifeSmell (PP)8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.73
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Changes in Quality of LifeAssessment (mITT)18.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.68
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Changes in Quality of LifeSocial (PP)17.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.39
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Changes in Quality of LifeDressing (mITT)9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.08
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Changes in Quality of LifeDressing (PP)14.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.85
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Changes in Quality of LifeSmell (mITT)4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.06
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Changes in Quality of LifeDressing (PP)7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.55
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Changes in Quality of LifeDrainage (mITT)11.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.83
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Changes in Quality of LifeSmell (mITT)1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.42
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Changes in Quality of LifeSocial (mITT)15.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.27
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Changes in Quality of LifeDressing (mITT)7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.04
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Changes in Quality of LifeAssessment (PP)24.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.34
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Changes in Quality of LifeDrainage (PP)17.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.57
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Changes in Quality of LifeSmell (PP)3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.59
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Changes in Quality of LifeSocial (PP)19.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.53
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Changes in Quality of LifeAssessment (mITT)17.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.36
Secondary

Percentage Area Reduction (PAR)

Percentage wound area reduction measured weekly with digital photographic planimetry and physical examination

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Both the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis populations are represented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Percentage Area Reduction (PAR)mITT48.8 percentStandard Deviation 82.81
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Percentage Area Reduction (PAR)PP93.7 percentStandard Deviation 15.28
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Percentage Area Reduction (PAR)mITT53.7 percentStandard Deviation 65.78
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Percentage Area Reduction (PAR)PP89.7 percentStandard Deviation 25.19
p-value: 0.78Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.48Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time to Heal

The time to achieve complete wound closure within 12 weeks.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Both the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis populations are represented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Time to HealmITT63.4 days
SOC primary dressing with MIRRAGEN™Time to HealPP57.5 days
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Time to HealmITT72.5 days
SOC primary dressing with FIBRACOL™Time to HealPP67.8 days
p-value: 0.049Log Rank
p-value: 0.084Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026