Dental
Conditions
Keywords
SLM, Milled, Bar overdenture
Brief summary
the aim of this study was to assess the marginal bone loss and soft tissue outcomes of milled and selective laser melted cobalt chromium bar retaining implant mandibular overdenture. Materials and method: twenty completely edentulous patients received new conventional complete dentures. Two implants were placed at mandibular canine areas, patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: milled co-cr bar group and selective laser melted bar group. Marginal bone loss, modified plaque index (mPI), probing depth (PD) and modified gingival index (mGI) were evaluated at base line, 6 and 12 months follow up visits.
Detailed description
Materials and method: twenty completely edentulous patients received new conventional complete dentures. Two implants were placed at mandibular canine areas, patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: milled co-cr bar group and selective laser melted bar group. Marginal bone loss, modified plaque index (mPI), probing depth (PD) and modified gingival index (mGI) were evaluated at base line, 6 and 12 months follow up visits.
Interventions
OTHERbar retained implant overdenture
use of bar attachment in completely edentulous patient
Sponsors
Minia University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* completely edentulous patient. * age range (50-60) years old. * adequate bone volume in canine area bilaterally to receive implant of 3.7 mm diameter and 13mm length verified by CBCT for all patients. * sufficient inter arch space (13-14mm) to accommodate bar construction * normal maxillo-mandibular relation-ship * (Angel's class I) * proper oral hygiene
Exclusion criteria
* patients with metabolic or systemic disease that may affect osseointegration. * history of radiation therapy. * history of bisphosphonate intake * heavy smoking and bad habits as bruxism.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Radiographic Evaluation (Vertical Marginal bone loss in millimeters) | at 6 and 12 months | using periapical x-ray with parallel long cone technique from implant shoulder till bony crest |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Probing depth in millimeters. | at 0,6 and 12 months | using sensitive pressure plastic probe in four sites mesial, distal, buccal and lingual |
| modified Plaque Index. | at 0,6 and 12 months follow up | using Mombelli charting scale at four aspects (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) |
| modified Gingival Index | at base line, 6 and 12 months | using Apsi charting scale at four sites (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed