Skip to content

Clareon PanOptix Pro vs. Clareon PanOptix - Study A

Contralateral Study of Clareon PanOptix Pro vs. Clareon PanOptix

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06400745
Enrollment
87
Registered
2024-05-06
Start date
2024-06-18
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2025-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aphakia, Presbyopia

Keywords

Cataract, IOL

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Clareon™ PanOptix™ Pro Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL) compared to Clareon™ PanOptix™ Trifocal IOL.

Detailed description

Subjects will attend 9 scheduled study visits for a total individual duration of participation of approximately 6 months. The primary endpoint will be assessed at the Month 2 follow-up visit. Both eyes of a subject must qualify for enrollment into this study.

Interventions

Intraocular lens (IOL) implanted in the eye for the visual correction of aphakia in adult patients with less than 1 diopter of preexisting corneal astigmatism in whom a cataractous lens has been removed. The IOL is intended to mitigate the effects of presbyopia on intermediate and near visual acuity while maintaining comparable distance visual acuity.

DEVICECPO IOL

Intraocular lens (IOL) implanted in the eye for the visual correction of aphakia in adult patients with less than 1 diopter of preexisting corneal astigmatism in whom a cataractous lens has been removed. The IOL is intended to mitigate the effects of presbyopia on intermediate and near visual acuity while maintaining distance visual acuity.

PROCEDURECataract surgery

Extraction of the cataractous lens by phacoemulsification, followed by implantation of the IOL.

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Contralateral (split face) study design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Understand and sign an ethics committee-approved informed consent form; * Willing and able to attend all scheduled study visits as required by the protocol; * Planned cataract surgery (both eyes); * Preoperative corneal astigmatism less that 1.00 diopter in each eye. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Women of childbearing potential if currently pregnant, intend to become pregnant during the study, or are breastfeeding; * Ocular conditions as specified in the protocol; * Subjects who desire monovision correction. * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Monocular Photopic Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)Month 2 postoperativeVisual Acuity (VA) was assessed for each eye individually using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) reading charts at a distance of 4 meters from the subject under photopic (well-lit) conditions with correction in place. BCDVA was measured in logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR). LogMAR values typically range from -0.3 (20/10 vision on the Snellen chart) to 1 (20/200 vision), with lower scores indicating better vision.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of the 87 randomized participants, 4 were discontinued after randomization and prior to attempted implantation. This reporting group includes all participants with attempted implantation (83).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CPO Pro IOL / CPO IOL
CPO Pro IOL Model PXYWT0 implanted in one eye with CPO IOL Model CNWTT0 implanted in the other eye, as randomized. The second eye surgery occurred approximately 7-14 days after the first eye surgery.
83
Total83

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCPO Pro IOL / CPO IOL
Age, Continuous68.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
73 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
64 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
83 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 830 / 00 / 00 / 83
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 836 / 838 / 830 / 83
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 831 / 833 / 832 / 83

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Monocular Photopic Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)

Visual Acuity (VA) was assessed for each eye individually using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) reading charts at a distance of 4 meters from the subject under photopic (well-lit) conditions with correction in place. BCDVA was measured in logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR). LogMAR values typically range from -0.3 (20/10 vision on the Snellen chart) to 1 (20/200 vision), with lower scores indicating better vision.

Time frame: Month 2 postoperative

Population: All-Implanted Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CPO Pro IOLMean Monocular Photopic Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)0.032 logMARStandard Deviation 0.0919
CPO IOLMean Monocular Photopic Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)0.023 logMARStandard Deviation 0.0813
t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026