Skip to content

Smartphone & Headphone Effects on Baropodometric Parameters

Effects of Smartphone and Headphone Usage on Baropodometric Parameters in Healthy Individuals

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06400576
Enrollment
35
Registered
2024-05-06
Start date
2024-04-25
Completion date
2024-10-23
Last updated
2024-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dual Task, Postural; Defect, Smartphone Addiction

Keywords

Postural oscillation, Headphone use, Messaging, Balance, Gait, Foot Pressure Distrubition, Smartphone addiction, Daily activites

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to observe baropodometric parameters such as postural sway and foot pressure distrubiton in healthy young participants between the ages of 18-35. The main questions it aims to answer are: * How does headphone usage affect baropodometric parameters in healthy young individuals? * How does texting affect baropodometric parameters in healthy young individuals? * How does headphone usage while texting affect baropodometric parameters in healthy young individuals? Participants will: * Only be evaluated once. * Stand on the Baropodometric device platform while standing, texting, listening to music, texting while listening to music for the static and posturographic balance evaluation. * Walk on the baropdometric device platform while standing, texting, listening to music, texting while listening to music for dynamic evaluation.

Detailed description

During our daily lives, the individuals perform many functions simultaneously. Two devices that modern technology has brought us are headphones and mobile phones, both of which are commonly used. Studies have shown that posture oscillation changes during walking while using a phone, but same studies also stated that more comprehensive studies are needed. There is no study in the literature that examines postural oscillation and foot pressure distribution while listening to music with headphones and messaging. The aim of this observational study is to evaluate the postural oscillation and foot pressure distribution during headphone use and messaging in healthy participants aged 18-35. The sample size of 35 participants was determined based on a similar study example using G-Power analysis. Participants will be assesed at Hacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation. Participants will be selected based on eligibility criteria, and there will be only one group in the study; therefore, randomization will not be performed. Participants enrolled in the study will be evaluated using the FreeMED force platform (Sensor Medica, Italy). The platform itself is 40x40 cm in size and comes with two plates, each one meter long. When all components are assembled, a continuous surface of 2.4 meters is obtained. Participants will participate in static, posturographic, and dynamic evaluations. In each evaluation, participants will first stand still, then put on headphones and listen to music at 80 decibels with a tempo of 130 bpm, then type a message, and finally type a message while listening to music. Static evaluation will provide information about foot pressure distribution; posturographic evaluation will include Romberg tests with eyes open, eyes closed, standing on one foot, and standing on two feet; and dynamic evaluation will assess participants' walking phases and speed. The statistical analysis of the study will be performed using SPSS 23.0 software.

Interventions

OTHERHeadphone and Smartphone Intervention

Asessment of participants' static balance and pressure distrubiton, posturographic balance and dynamic balance whilst using headphones and messaging.

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Agreeing to participate in the study voluntarily, * Being between the ages of 18-35

Exclusion criteria

* Not agreeing to participate in the study voluntarily. * Having a congenital spinal cord anomaly * Existing neurological, orthopedic, inflammatory, cardiovascular, rheumatological, vestibular problems * Having a surgical history of the spinal region

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feet Loading Pattern - Medial Lateral Loadthrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesIt will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and will be used to asses the feet loading pattern.
Baropodometer assessments- Dynamic average speedthrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesIt will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and the recording measurement unit will be milimeters/second.
Baropodometer assesments - Dynamic Gait Phase Durationsthrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesIt will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and the recording measurement unit will be percentages
Feet Loading Pattern - Dynamic Longitudinal Arcthrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesIt will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and will be used to asses the feet loading pattern.
Feet Loading Pattern - Forefoot Reatfoot Loadthrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesIt will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and will be used to asses the feet loading pattern.
Baropodometer assessments- Posturographic average sway velocitythrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesSway velocity will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and the recording measurement unit will be degrees.
Baropodometer assessments- Static pressure distributionthrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesPressure distribution will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and the recording measurement unit will be percentages.
Baropodometer assessments- Posturographic center of gravitythrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesCenter of gravity will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and the recording measurement unit will be milimeters.
Baropodometer assessments- Posturographic oscillationsthrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesOscillations will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and the recording measurement unit will be milimeters.
Baropodometer assesments - Posturographic Sway Lengththrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesIt will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and the recording measurement unit will be milimeters.
Baropodometer assesments - Posturographic Displacement Towards X and Y axisthrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesIt will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and the recording measurement unit will be milimeters.
Baropodometer assessments- Dynamic average surfacethrough study intervention, an average of 15 minutesAverage surface will be assessed with FreeMed baropodometric platform and the recording measurement unit will be cm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
New York Posture AssesmentAt BaselineThis form will assess participants' postural alignment. Total scores range from 13 to 65, with results categorized as: 'excellent' (above 45), 'good' (40-44), 'fair' (30-39), 'poor' (20-29), and 'very poor'.
International Physical Activity QuestionnaireAt BaselineThis form will assess participants' physical fitness and well-being. Based on MET minutes per week, the results are categorized into three activity levels: inactive, minimally active and very active.
The Cognitive Flexibility InventoryAt BaselineThe Cognitive Flexibility Inventory is a 20-item self-report measure to monitor how often individuals engaged in cognitive behavioural thought challenging interventions. The total score ranges between 20 and 140, where higher scores indicate more cognitive flexibility.
Forward Head PostureAt BaselineIt will be assessed with a digital inclinometer, the measurement unit will be in degrees.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026