Skip to content

Preoperative PSMA PET/CT As Triage for EPLND in Patients Scheduled for RALP (PrePSMA)

Preoperative PSMA PET/CT As Triage for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection (ePLND) in Patients Scheduled for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALP)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06398613
Acronym
PrePSMA
Enrollment
600
Registered
2024-05-03
Start date
2024-04-26
Completion date
2029-12-31
Last updated
2024-12-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

PSMA PET/CT, ePLND

Brief summary

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is considered the gold standard for nodal staging in men with prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this project is to determine if preoperative prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomograpy (CT) can safely replace ePLND as a staging method in PCa patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).

Detailed description

Due to the latest change in EAU guidelines in May 2024, all eligible patients will undergo PSMA PET/CT. Patients will then be randomized between RALP and ePLND (Arm A) and RALP +/- ePLND (arm B): If PSMA PET/CT detect suspicious pelvic nodes, the patient will undergo ePLND concomitant with RALP. If PSMA PET/CT is negative, only RALP will be performed . Primary outcome measures: Difference in biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate between arm A and arm B within 2 years after initiation of primary treatment (BCR ≥ 0.2 ng/ml). Secondary outcome measures: Difference between Arm A and Arm B for surgical complications, persistent PSA after RALP and initiation of salvage therapy

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTextended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND)

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PSMA PET/CT) will done preoperatively in both arms of the study. In arm A all patients will undergo ePLND, in arm B only patients with positive PSMA PET/CT will undergo ePLND

Sponsors

University Hospital, Akershus
CollaboratorOTHER
Oslo University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Biopsy proven diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the prostate * Indication for ePLND combined with RALP: * High-risk group (EAU) and including MRI findings indicating extra prostatic extension (Likert scale ≥4) * -ISUP GG 3 with ≥1 of the following unfavourable risk factors * cT2b-c, * ≥50% percentage of positive biopsy cores, * PSA 10-20 * cN1 selected to surgery * Written informed consent * No known allergies for PSMA tracer * 18 years and older

Exclusion criteria

* History of previously actively treated PCa * Previous malignancies (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin) that has not been recurrence-free past ≥5 years * Unwillingness or inability to undergo PSMA PET/CT and/or ePLND and RALP * Presence of distant metastasis (cM1) on MRI imaging

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference between Arm A and Arm B in biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate between groups within 2 years after initiation of RALP2 years after initiation of primary treatmentBCR is defined as PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference between Arm A and Arm B in incidence and types of surgical complications3 months follow upClavien Dindo classification of complications will be used
Difference between Arm A and Arm B in persistent PSA after RALP2 months after RALPIf the PSA value 6 weeks postoperatively is \> 0.10 ng/ml the patient has persistent PSA
Difference between Arm A and Arm B in initiation of salvage therapy2 years follow upSalvage therapy is salvage radiation therapy, salvage surgery and ADT

Countries

Norway

Contacts

Primary ContactViktor Berge, PhD
vikber@ous-hf.no+4791599615

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026