Skip to content

Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Reseonance Imaging(MRI) in the Assessment of Anterior Knee Pain

Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Reseonance Imaging(MRI) in the Assessment of Anterior Knee Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06398535
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-05-03
Start date
2024-04-30
Completion date
2024-12-10
Last updated
2024-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Knee Pain

Brief summary

Anterior knee pain , often known as patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), is a prevalent orthopedic ailment. It usually happens while you're bending your knees. It can affect people of all ages, although it is most common among teenagers, young adults, and athletes . The actual etiology of anterior knee pain might be complicated, encompassing a variety of conditions; it causes disability, discomfort and a negative impact on the quality of life . A number of diagnostic techniques, including plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, arthroscopy and ultrasound are used to identify the pathologies causing anterior knee pain. Arthroscopy, though accurate, is invasive and can cause complications. Palin radiographs and computed tomography expose patients to radiations

Interventions

DEVICEmagenetic resonance and ultrasound

examination of patient using magentic resonace coil for imaging of knee and comapring the results obtaines by ultrasound examination using the ulatrsound tarsnsducer .

Sponsors

Sohag University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults who presented by knee pain , limitation of movement at knee.

Exclusion criteria

* Knee trauma, non-cooperative patients and those who refuse to participate, contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging, such as patients with cardiac pacemakers, metallic plates, and claustrophobia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
sensitivity6 monthsdegress of sensitivity of ultrsound compaired to magentic resonance

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAsmaa M Abdelrady, resident
asmaa_mostafa_post@med.sohag.edu.eg01096329376
Backup ContactMohamed H Alameldeen, assistant professor
01224648517

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026