Skip to content

Gingival Margin Stability Following Esthetic Crown Lengthening Utilizing a Double Periodontal Surgical Guide

Gingival Margin Stability Following Esthetic Crown Lengthening by Electrocautery, Diode Laser, or a Scalpel Blade Utilizing a Double Periodontal Surgical Guide. (A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06397521
Enrollment
21
Registered
2024-05-03
Start date
2024-05-20
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crown Lengthening

Keywords

Digital, Surgical guide

Brief summary

In patients with excessive gingival display, esthetic crown lengthening procedure by means of scalpel, diode laser or electro-surgery could result in the same gingival marginal stability at 3 and 6 months follow up.

Detailed description

Scalpel crown lengthening has been recommended as the gold standard for treating excessive gingiva. Two other established tools used for gingivectomy procedures are electrosurgery and lasers. Laser crown lengthening may have the advantages of less bleeding during the procedure, faster healing, and less pain following the procedure. Electrosurgery which involves the application of a high- frequency electric current to the gingiva has been shown to produce minimal bleeding, ease and speed of cutting and reduced postoperative pain. The null hypothesis that the three techniques for aesthetic crown lengthening (ACLP) would show equivalent gingival margin stability at 3 and 6 months follow up.

Interventions

Investigation of the three techniques for aesthetic crown lengthening

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Three techniques for aesthetic crown lengthening

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Altered passive eruption as presence of quadratic anterior teeth \[crown width/length ratio * 0.85 \]. * Gingival margin located coronal to the tooth cervical convexity and \>2 mm of gingival band display during maximum smile. * Patients with treated periodontal disease (i.e., stage I of periodontitis);

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with systemic contraindications for oral surgery as uncontrolled diabetes. * patients on drug therapy related with drug-associated gingival enlargement. * Areas in which the remaining amount of keratinized gingiva after the submarginal incision is less than 3 mm. * Previous surgical treatment in the same area.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
position of the gingival margin3 and 6 months postoperativeposition of the gingival margin (GM) (Degree of Gingival Rebound) after performing an aesthetic crown lengthening procedure

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactDoaa Adel-Khattab, PhD
dr.doaa.adel-khattab@dent.asu.edu.eg01006814258

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026