Skip to content

Comparative Effects of Propioceptive Neuromascular Facilitation and Neural Flossing in Diabetic Neuropathy

Comparative Effects of Propioceptive Neuromascular Facilitation and Neural Flossing on Balance and Gait in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06397209
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-05-02
Start date
2023-12-23
Completion date
2024-10-01
Last updated
2024-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Keywords

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, Neural Flossing, Propioceptive Neuromascular facilitation

Brief summary

To compare the effects of propioceptive neuromascular facilitation and neural flossing on balance and gait in diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Detailed description

In 2023,conducted systematic review to evaluate the effects of Tai Chi on postural control in people with PN. The meta-analysis found that Tai Chi therapy for people with PN resulted in a smaller sway area, in the double-leg stance with eyes closed test , than that observed in the control group, greater distance covered in the six-minute walking test and faster performance in the timed-up-and-go test, than the baseline. Tai chi effectively enhanced dynamic postural control in people with PN. However, no better effects on postural control from Tai Chi than from other rehabilitation approaches were observed in this study. In 2023,compare the effects of Functional strength training Versus Neurodynamic exercises on Balance and Gait of patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Both Functional Strength Training Exercises and Neurodynamic Exercises were found to improve the Balance and Gait in patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. However, the Functional Strength Training showed more significantly improvement in Balance and Gait subsequently reducing fall and fall risk injury. As per researcher knowledge, there is no comprehensive study comparing the effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Neural Flossing on balance and gait in individuals with diabetic neuropathy. While both methods have been studied independently, a direct head-to-head comparison is needed. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each approach in the context of diabetic neuropathy could provide valuable insights for clinicians and researchers.

Interventions

OTHERPropioceptive Neuromascular facilitation

Propioceptive Neuromascular Facilitation techniques will be given for 5 days/week,10 repetitions,30 minutes/day for 8 weeks

Neural Flossing exercises will be given for 5 days/week, 3 sets of 10 repetitions in 2 minutes for 30 minutes for 8 weeks

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinically Diagnosed with type I and II diabetes * Patients 45 to 65 years of age * The participants who scored \<3 as per the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) were included in the study. * Able to stand and walk without assistance

Exclusion criteria

* Patients have other neurological or orthopedic impairments (such as stroke,cerebral palsy, poliomyelitis, rheumatoid arthritis, prosthesis, or moderate or severe osteoarthritis) * Major vascular complications (venous or arterial ulcers). * Severe retinopathy * Severe nephropathy that causes edema or requires haemodialysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Berg balance scale8th weekThe BBS was developed to assess the balance among elderly people with impairment in balance function by measuring the performance of functional tasks. It is a 14-item scale designed to measure the balance of the older adults in a clinical setting, and the maximum score of the scale is 56.The score between the ranges of 41-56 is considered to below risk fall, whereas 21-40 and 0-20 are considered to be medium risk fall and high risk fall, respectively.
Dynamic Gait Index8th weekDGI assesses a person's ability to modify balance while walking in the presence of external demands. DGI is performed with a marked distance of 20 feet either with or without assistive devices. The scoring is based on a 4- point scale, and the highest possible score is 24 points. DGI score between 21 and 24 depicts safe ambulatory, whereas score of \<21 is predictive of falls.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary Contactwajiha shahid, PhD
wajishahid89@gmail.com03214885079

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026