Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06397053

Enrollment

242

Registered

2024-05-02

Start date

2019-12-01

Completion date

2024-01-29

Last updated

2024-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Cancer, Robotic Surgery, Visceral Obesity

Brief summary

Our team has previously published articles providing detailed descriptions of the steps involved in both RS and LS. All surgeries adhered to the total mesorectal excision (TME) principle. In RS, a surgeon employed the Da Vinci Xi surgical system featuring a five-port setup, while five physicians conducted LS with a similarly configured five-port approach. Both the RS and LS doctors are experienced. The surgeries were conducted according to standard procedures, and the RS group utilized totally robotic rectal resection.

Interventions

PROCEDURErobotic surgery

robotic surgery

Study design

Observational model

CASE_CONTROL

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 90 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

(1) confirmed pathology of mid-to-low rectal cancer (within 10 centimeters from the anal margin); (2) availability of comprehensive pathological and computed tomography (CT) data; (3) presence of a diagnosis indicating visceral obesity.

Exclusion criteria

Multiple tumor

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
early postoperative problems	2019-2023	early postoperative problems

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026