Comparison of Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06394856

Enrollment

Registered

2024-05-01

Start date

2018-07-01

Completion date

2021-07-01

Last updated

2024-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Tears

Brief summary

rotator cuff tears are one of the most common shoulder issues , affecting 20.7% of the general population .

Detailed description

accompanied by shoulder pain and dysfunction

Interventions

PROCEDURERotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques

rotator cuff tears with modified versus classic double row suture bridge

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

40 Years to 65 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* full-thickness supraspinatus * degenerative tears * age range 40 :65

Exclusion criteria

* subscapularis tear * small and massive tears * traumatic tears * partial -thickness tear * revisioin surgery * glenohumeral arthretic changes and shoulder instability

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
retear rate	3 years	retear rate

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
time	3 years	duration of operation

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026