Myopia
Conditions
Keywords
Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy, High Myopia, bandage contact lenses
Brief summary
The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of employing bandage contact lenses with a base curve of 8.4 mm versus 8.8 mm on visual recovery following Trans-PRK in patients characterized by steep corneas and high myopia.
Detailed description
Comparing two kind of bandage lenses in the contralateral eyes of the same individual following Trans-PRK may enable the derivation of reliable conclusions regarding the optimal choice for bandage lenses after Trans-PRK.
Interventions
Both eyes were treated consecutively in each patient by single-step Trans-PRK performed by SCHWIND Amaris 500 S excimer laser platform (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany). Topical Proparacaine Hydrochloride Eye Drops 0.5% (Alcaine, Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA) were used to anesthetize the eyes, and use povidone-iodine to disinfect the eyelid skin. After a lid speculum had been inserted, and the other eye was blocked. Epithelial and stromal ablations were performed using a single continuous laser shooting session on an excimer laser platform. After the appeals step, Mitomycin C 0.02 % was applied to the stromal surface for 20 s, then rinse with cold salt water.
After surgery. A contact lens placed on the cornea, with an 8.4-mm base curve in right eye and one with an 8.8-mm base curve in the left eye.
After surgery. A contact lens placed on the cornea, with an 8.8-mm base curve in right eye and one with an 8.4-mm base curve in the left eye.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Spherical equivalent refractive error between -6.00 and -8.00 D in either eye. Astigmatism of no more than 2.0 D in either eye. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) according to the logarithm of the Minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) scale of 0 or better in both eyes. Willing and able to participate in all required activities of the study.
Exclusion criteria
Diabetes mellitus. Systemic connective tissue disease. Cardiovascular disease, epilepsy. Eyelid abnormalities. Corneal disease. Glaucoma. A history of ocular disease. Noncompliance with measurement at enrollment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Early postoperative uncorrected visual acuity | 14 days | All visual acuity measurements were performed using a standard logarithmic eye chart |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| re-epithelialization after Trans-PRK | 1 week | A ophthalmologist will examine the corneal epithelium in all eyes. The assessment of corneal epithelial defects involves measuring the horizontal and vertical diameters using a slit lamp beam with a ruler. The extent of corneal epithelial defects is determined by calculating the area of the ellipse (S=πa×b). |
| postoperative pain score after Trans-PRK | 2 weeks | Patients will be asked to complete a pain questionnaire at postoperative 0, 2, 12 hours and 1, 4, 7, 14 days. A visual analog scale (VAS) was employed to assess the severity of pain in each eye. The scores are defined as follows: 0 points: no pain; 1-3 points: mild pain, does not affect work and life; 4-6 points: moderate pain, affects work, does not affect life; 7-10 points: severe pain, affects both work and life |
| spherical equivalent after Trans-PRK | 1 week | Optometry is performed using a computerized optometre. The spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated using the formula DS+DC/2, where DS denotes the diopter sphere and DC denotes the diopter cylinder. |
Countries
China