Skip to content

A Conversational Agent (Cecebot) to Improve Insomnia in Stage I-III Breast Cancer Survivors

A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Acceptability and Efficacy of Cecebot, a Conversational Agent for Insomnia After Breast Cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06392789
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-04-30
Start date
2024-10-04
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2026-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Insomnia

Brief summary

This clinical trial evaluates the effect of conversational agent, Cecebot, on improving insomnia in stage I-III breast cancer survivors. Sleep disturbance ranks among the top concerns reported by breast cancer survivors and is associated with poor quality of life. Many breast cancer survivors also have decreased physical activity, which may also have a negative impact on sleep and quality of life. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTi) and physical activity interventions have individually been reported to improve sleep and to have a positive impact on quality of life. Cecebot is a personalized short messaging service (SMS)-based behavioral intervention that combines CBTi and physical activity strategies that may improve sleep for breast cancer survivors.

Detailed description

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups. GROUP I (INTERVENTION): Patients receive sleep education SMS conversations and access to website content modules over 10 minutes 2-4 times per week, sleep compression SMS conversations once weekly (QW), and wear activity tracker daily on weeks 1-6. GROUP II (WAITLIST CONTROL): Patients receive sleep education SMS conversations and access to website content modules over 10 minutes 2-4 times per week, sleep compression SMS conversations QW, and wear activity tracker daily on weeks 7-12.

Interventions

Receive sleep education

OTHERInternet-Based Intervention

Receive access to website content modules

OTHERMedical Device Usage and Evaluation

Wear activity tracker

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Receive sleep compression SMS conversations

Sponsors

University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER
The Hope Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years * Prior diagnosis of stage I-III invasive breast cancer * Female gender * Clinically significant insomnia symptoms, defined as a Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance 8 T-score of 55 or greater * Insomnia complaints lasting ≥ 3 months * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, indicating ability to perform activities of daily living * Own a smartphone with Internet connectivity * Willing and able to complete the intervention with personal smartphone * Proficient in speaking and reading English * Completed breast cancer treatment within past 5 years

Exclusion criteria

* Prior diagnosis of restless leg syndrome, periodic leg movement disorder, narcolepsy, or rapid eye movement (REM) behavior disorder * Current sleep apnea (treated or untreated) * Current shiftwork * Actively receiving chemotherapy or radiation (endocrine therapy permitted) * Previously received CBTi therapy with a professional therapist * Contraindications to CBTi including: * Active psychosis * Uncontrolled bipolar disorder * Severe depression * Active substance use disorder (moderate or greater severity) * Use of prescribed sleep medication \> 3 times per week * Previously participated in user testing of the study intervention (Cecebot) * Unwilling or unable to complete study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment discontinuation rateUp to week 6 of interventionDefined as the proportion of all treatment participants who permanently stop the intervention prior to week 6 for any reason. An all-cause discontinuation rate of 40% or less will be considered a threshold for acceptability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of adverse events (AEs)Up to week 12Intervention safety will be determined by reviewing and quantifying the number of adverse events, serious events and by reviewing the type and severity of AEs attributed to study procedures among each study group.
Recruitment ratesUp to week 12Recruitment rate will be defined as the percentage of participants enrolled of those approached.
Enrollment rateUp to week 12Enrollment rate will be defined as the percent enrolled of those eligible.
Lost to follow-upUp to week 12Lost to follow-up will be defined as the percent who dropped out of those enrolled. A benchmark to determine feasibility is less than 40% loss to follow-up.
AE rateAt week 6 of interventionAE rate will be defined as the percentage of AEs during the intervention. The number of participants experiencing an adverse event attributable to study procedures will be compared after the first 6 weeks to identify if any detectable differences are present between the treatment group and waitlist control group.
Adherence to sleep recommendationsUp to week 12Adherence to sleep recommendations will be defined as the percent who reported wake time recommended by Cecebot. Participant bed times and wake times will be compared to recommendations offered by Cecebot.
Adherence to physical activity (PA) recommendationUp to week 12Adherence to PA recommendations will be defined as the percent who achieved PA goals.
Data entry adherenceUp to week 12Data entry adherence will be defined as the percent of sleep efficiency and PA data collection forms completed.
Intervention engagementUp to week 12Intervention engagement will be defined as the percent of educational modules interacted with by the user providing text-based responses.
Sleep quality and the impact of insomniaAt week 0, 6 and 12The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and daily sleep diaries will be used to assess sleep quality and the impact of insomnia. The ISI will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale of 7 questions yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating higher severity of insomnia.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKerryn Reding

Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026