Skip to content

Clinical, Cognitive and Neural Effects of Potentiation of ECT by rTMS in Treatment-Resistant Depression

Clinical, Cognitive and Neural Effect of Potentiation of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) at 10 ECT in Patients With Characterized Pharmacoresistant Depressive Episode

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06391723
Acronym
STIMAGNECT2
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-04-30
Start date
2024-06-30
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2024-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Treatment-resistant-depression, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), combination of neurostimulation techniques

Brief summary

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most effective treatments for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, due to response delay and cognitive impairment, ECT remains an imperfect treatment. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, our objective is to assess the priming effect of rTMS sessions before ECT on clinical, cognitive and neural response in patients with TRD.

Detailed description

80 patients with TRD will be assigned to active or sham rTMS before ECT treatment. Five sessions of active/sham rTMS will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (20 Hz, 90% resting motor threshold, 20 2 s trains with 60-s intervals, 800 pulses/session) before ECT (which was active for all patients) started. Then, from the sixth ECT session, an rTMS session will occur the day before each ECT session. Clinical assessment, cognitive assessment and brain imaging (structural MRI, resting state functional MRI, MR spectroscopy) will take place before and after 10 ECT sessions. Clinical, cognitive and neural changes will be compared between both groups after 10 ECT sessions. The primary outcome will be the response rate after 10 ECT, i.e. the percentage of patients who achieved a reduction of 50% or more from their initial Hamilton Depression Scale score (HAMD-21 items).

Interventions

DEVICEActive rTMS

rTMS will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (20 Hz, 90% resting motor threshold, 20 2 s trains with 60-s intervals, 800 pulses/session)

DEVICESham rTMS

Sham rTMS will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

Sponsors

University Hospital, Rouen
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne, Paris
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier du Rouvray
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with Major Depressive Disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria * HAMD score ≥15 * In case of unipolar disorder: no remission after at least two different antidepressants prescribed at a dose and duration sufficient for the current episode * In the case of bipolar disorder: no remission despite lithium at an adequate plasma level combined with lamotrigine or quetiapine monotherapy at full dose * No change of antidepressant or mood stabilizer treatment for at least 15 days * To be rTMS-naive * Without benzodiazepine or antiepileptic treatment for at least 15 days * To understand spoken and written French * Having given their informed, written consent

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), anesthesia * Patients who have received ECT in the last 6 months * Patients suffering from poorly stabilized epilepsy, serious neurological or systemic disorders * Patients with a serious substance use disorder (other than nicotine or caffeine) according to DSM-5 criteria * Patients suffering from severe hearing problems * Subjects already treated with an electrical or magnetic stimulation technique * Women who do not have adequate contraception, pregnant or breastfeeding women * Being deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision * Patients participating or having participated in an interventional clinical trial within 30 days before the inclusion visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response rate after 10 ECTDay 0 and Day 40the percentage of patients who achieved a reduction of 50% or more from their initial Hamilton Depression Scale score (HAMD-21 items)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The relative improvement of depressive symptoms throughout the study (self-reported)Day 0, Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology
Adverse effectsDay 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40Assessment of adverse effects with the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) side effects rating scale adapted to rTMS (adapted UKU)
Subjective assessment of memoryDay 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40Scores and variations in memory assessed with the Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire (SSMQ)
Subjective assessment of cognitive functioningDay 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40Scores and variations in cognitive functioning assessed with the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ)
Global cognitive functioning (objective)Day 0 and Day 40Scores and variations assessed with the Mini Mental Status Examination
Verbal memory performances (objective)Day 0 and Day 40Scores and variations assessed with the RL/RI-16 test
Attention (objective)Day 0 and Day 40Scores and variations assessed the D2 test of attention
Visuospatial and constructional ability (objective)Day 0 and Day 40Scores and variations assessed with the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test
The relative improvement of depressive symptoms throughout the study (assessed by a clinician)Day 0, Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40the relative variation of HAMD-21
Seizure thresholdDay 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37Seizure threshold during ECT
Seizure durationDay 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37Seizure duration during ECT
Postictal SuppressionDay 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37Postictal Suppression during ECT
Dose of medicationDay 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37Dose of medication during ECT
Changes in regional gray matter densityDay 0 and Day 40Changes in regional gray matter density measured with 3D MRI
Changes in cortical thicknessDay 0 and Day 40Changes in cortical thickness measured with 3D MRI
Brain activity and biochemical changesDay 0 and Day 40Changes measured with Resting state functional MRI and spectroscopy MRI
Autobiographical memory (objective)Day 0 and Day 40Scores and variations assessed with the autobiographical memory test (TEMPau)

Contacts

Primary ContactMaud Rotharmel
maud.rotharmel@ch-lerouvray.fr+33232956825
Backup ContactVirginie Moulier
virginie.moulier@ch-lerouvray.fr

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026