Skip to content

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases

A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (SBRT) Versus Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) for Participants With Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06391242
Enrollment
230
Registered
2024-04-30
Start date
2025-03-07
Completion date
2028-01-01
Last updated
2026-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer Metastatic

Brief summary

This study is being done to answer the following question: Is Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy or SBRT (a form of radiation therapy which can deliver high doses of radiation to the specific painful area of the body most affected by cancer, while keeping the radiation beams away from the healthy parts of the body that surround the cancer) better for pain relief than the standard treatment of conventional radiation therapy or CRT (a form of radiation therapy which delivers radiation to the painful area but can also negatively affect other parts of the body in the same area)

Detailed description

This is a multi-centre, phase III randomized controlled trial comparing SBRT to conventional palliative EBRT in patients with solid tumours and a dominant painful non-spine bone metastasis as defined by a worst pain score of 2 or greater. 230 participants will be enrolled to the study. Participants will have radiation for 5 treatments (conventional palliative EBRT 20Gy/5; SBRT 30Gy/5 or 35Gy/5) and then will be followed for pain response and radiological progression at 3 and 6 months post treatment.

Interventions

RADIATIONStandard Conventional Radiotherapy

20Gy in 5 fractions

RADIATIONStereotactic Body Radiotherapy

30 or 35Gy in 5 fractions

Sponsors

Canadian Cancer Trials Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologic confirmation of solid tumour. * Patient with a dominant painful non-spine bone metastasis and a worst minimum pain score of 2 using the BPI attributed to that dominant site * Expected overall survival of greater than 6 months as determined by the treating physician * Suitable for protocol defined SBRT and CRT. * Stable pain with no immediate plan to alter analgesic regimen. * ECOG performance status of 0-2. * Participant consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory requirements. Each participant must sign a consent form prior to enrolment in the trial to document their willingness to participate

Exclusion criteria

* Metastases of the hands, feet, cranium or spine (including sacrum) as the dominant/index pain site. * Bone metastasis arising from a small cell or germ cell. * Radionuclide therapy within 30 days of randomization. * Patient treated with prior palliative RT to the dominant painful bone metastasis site (prior radiation exposure is permitted if prior to development of the dominant metastasis and would not influence the applicability of either treatment arm of the current study). * Received systemic chemotherapy within 1 week of the protocol RT, or who are expected/planned to receive chemotherapy within one week of completing protocol RT. * Participants with an unstable pathologic fracture at the dominant painful bone metastasis, or for whom surgical fixation would be the preferred intervention if possible. * Pregnant or lactating individuals.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Complete pain response utilizing the Cochran-Mantel-Hanzeal test27 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain response pattern at 3 months: partial, stable or progressive pain27 months
Early (1 month post RT) and late (6 months post RT) CPR and response patterns (partial, stable, and progressive pain);27 months
Re-irradiation rate within the 6-month follow-up period27 months
Incidence of fracture at the radiation target site27 months
Incidence of treatment-related AE rates >/- grade 2 utilizing CTCAE v527 months
Imaging-based local control rates at 3 and 6 months post-treatment27 months
Patient reported outcomes utilizing EORTC QLQ-C3027 months
Patient reported outcomes utilizing EORTC QLQ-BM2227 months

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTWendy Parulekar
wparulekar@ctg.queensu.ca613-533-6430
STUDY_CHAIRArjun Sahgal

Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

STUDY_CHAIRTim Nguyen

London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 12, 2026