Skip to content

TBP Survey Among Respiratory Physicians

A Survey on the Practice and Interpretation of Various Diagnostic Tests for Tuberculous Pleuritis Among Respiratory Physicians

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06390969
Enrollment
418
Registered
2024-04-30
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pleural Effusion, Tuberculosis, Pleural

Brief summary

Tuberculosis is a major infectious disease with a high mortality burden in the Asia-Pacific region and worldwide. Among various types of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, tuberculous pleuritis (TBP) is amongst the most common manifestations. TBP is also a major underlying cause among patients hospitalised with new-onset unilateral pleural effusion. The workup of TBP frequently involves thoracentesis to retrieve pleural fluid and pleural biopsy for microbiological and histological interpretations. However, the diagnostic accuracy of these tests is of unsatisfactory sensitivity, making diagnosing TBP challenging. In addition, certain tests, including pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA), Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction (MTB PCR), advanced biopsy procedures (e.g. real-time image-guided biopsy, pleuroscopy) are not readily available in developing regions due to scarcity of resources and lack of expertise. All these factors lead to heterogeneous practice in approaching new-onset pleural effusion, interpretation of pleural TB investigations, and timing of TBP treatment initiation among respiratory physicians in different Asia-Pacific regions. The proposed multinational survey aims to understand the real-world clinical practice in approaching patients with new-onset unilateral pleural effusion and diagnosing TBP in Asia-Pacific regions with intermediate to high TB burden. The results will reflect the current practice of diagnosing TBP, clinical and resource discrepancies in investigating TBP, management of TBP and help prioritise the need for further research in TBP

Detailed description

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major global health threats, with an estimated 10.6 million people infected with TB in 2021, with 1.6 million dying from the disease. Apart from pulmonary involvement as the major manifestation of TB, there is an increasing trend of extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) reported in different continents. Among EPTB, TB pleuritis (TBP) was the most prevalent form in several large Chinese retrospective studies. Diagnosing TBP is challenging due to paucibacillary involvement (TB disease caused by a small number of bacteria) of the pleural space. A diagnosis of definite TBP can be secured if the acid-fast bacilli (AFB), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture of pleural fluid reveals positive results. However, these conventional diagnostic tests for TBP are insufficiently sensitive, and the long turnaround time of culture would also delay the initial clinical management. The diagnosis of definite TBP may also be based on compatible histological findings of the pleural tissue obtained by biopsy procedures (bedside biopsy by Abram's needle, real-time image-guided biopsy by radiologists or experienced respiratory physicians, or pleuroscopy). The availability and waiting time of these procedures vary in different regions. Due to these reasons, a diagnosis of probable TBP may be pursued instead. This diagnostic entity is based on compatible clinical presentations with exudative, lymphocytic pleural effusion and raised pleural fluid biomarkers, commonly adenosine deaminase (ADA), without diagnostic microbiological results and alternative clinical explanation \[10\]. Other than pleural fluid ADA, several pleural fluid biomarkers have been explored to assist in diagnosing probable TBP. Therefore, a significant proportion of patients suspected to have TBP may have empirical anti-TB treatment initiated in the absence of a confirmatory diagnosis. In addition, these diagnostic clinical challenges are magnified among Asia-Pacific developing countries where contemporary diagnostic tools may be unavailable and hinder local TB control. There is a lack of regional Asia-Pacific real-world evidence of how TBP is diagnosed and how pleural fluid biomarkers are used. We hypothesise that heterogeneous practice towards new-onset unilateral pleural effusion and understanding different diagnostic tests for diagnosing TBP across different countries depends on the TB burden and availability of advanced pleural services. Therefore, a multinational survey study is designed to understand the real-world practice of managing new-onset unilateral pleural effusion, the availability and utilisation of different diagnostic tests for TBP, and the factors determining the timing of initiating empirical anti-TB treatment for TBP among respiratory physicians in the Asia-Pacific region.

Interventions

OTHERSurvey

Cross-sectional online survey

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Respiratory doctors practising in Asia-Pacific region

Exclusion criteria

* Do not consent for the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment decision1 monththe proprtion of respondents that would consider TBP as one of the differential diagnoses when approaching new-onset unilateral pleural effusion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Test availability1 monthTo evaluate the availability of different diagnostic tests for diagnosing TBP, in 5 point Likert scale
Disease understanding1 monthTo evaluate the understanding and utilisation of pleural fluid biomarkers for TBP among respiratory physicians, in 5 point Likert scale
Treatment decision for suspected tuberculosis1 monthTo evaluate the factors determining the initiation of empirical anti-TB treatment for probable TBP, in 5 point Likert scale

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORDavid SC Hui, MD

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026