Skip to content

Personalized Motor Learning in Primary Care Physiotherapy (TREAT)

Personalized Motor Learning in Primary Care Physiotherapy; A Prospective Formative Process Evaluation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06390800
Enrollment
10
Registered
2024-04-30
Start date
2023-09-06
Completion date
2024-03-15
Last updated
2024-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Geriatric Patients, Neurological Disorder

Brief summary

Over the last decade many scientific articles have been published on motor learning in neurological and geriatric rehabilitation. To make the available findings comprehendible and clear for physiotherapists, a card set and website have been developed. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the use and experiences of the card set and website designed to aid the physiotherapist in decision making with regards to motor learning. The following research question is central to this evaluation: How are the developed card set and website used and experienced by physiotherapists in primary care during the treatment of patients with neurological or geriatric conditions?

Detailed description

Method: Formative process evaluation. Over the last decade many scientific articles have been published on motor learning in neurological and geriatric rehabilitation. To make the available findings comprehendible and clear for physiotherapists, a card set and website have been developed. Participating physiotherapists will use the card set and website in their daily practice for a period of six months. To assess the usage and experiences of therapists, digital questionnaires will be administered prior to the intervention, at 3 months, and at 6 months, along with bi-weekly monitoring. The quantitative data from the questionnaires and monitoring will be analyzed using descriptive statistics (e.g., frequency tables, means, medians, IQR, and summary figures). Additionally, an interim evaluation will take place where solutions for the main user issues will be collectively brainstormed with the participants. Finally, a consensus meeting will be held to reach the final versions of the card set and website. The nominal group technique will be used to ensure active participation from all participants and to achieve consensus on the definitive list of modifications.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Fysio Bunde
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fysio Regtop
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fysiotherapie zesgehuchten
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fysiotherapie Veldhoven zuyd
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fysiotherapie ART-health
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fysio van het Hoof
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fysiotherapie Corine Cuijpers
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Frank Helgers
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fysiotherapie Kemps-Rijf
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Cerfontaine&vanderLoop
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fysiotherapie Denssana
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Regieorgaan SIA
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Brunel University London
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fontys Paramedische Hogeschool
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Kennisnetwerk CVA Nederland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie (KNGF)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Zuyd University of Applied Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Physiotherapists will be eligible for inclusion when they: * have at least one year of working experience * are treating neurological and/or geriatric patients * are able to attend the preparatory training provided by the researchers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
QuestionnaireSix monthsA qualitative questionnaire will be filled in three times throughout the study. This questionnaire inquires participants' experience regarding the card set and website.
MonitorSix monthsA quantitative questionnaire will be filled in biweekly. This questionnaire assesses the frequency of usage of the card set and website
Midterm evaluationAt three months into the studyThis meeting will be held to further specify and solve user problems. During this in-person session, problems that arise during the usage of the material will be discussed in depth under supervision from an experienced researcher. The meeting will be audio recorded whereafter it will be transcribed and analyzed into clusters and themes.
Consensus meetingAt six months into the studyThe goal of this meeting is to reach a final version of the card set and website based on the experiences from the process evaluation. During the in-person session, a nominal group method will ensure consensus regarding possible changes to the material and future directions the material should take e.g., more emphasis on the analogue or digital component or implementation into education. Through communal voting participants will make decisions regarding possible solutions or directions of the material. The session will be audio recorded and transcribed for analysis.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026