Skip to content

The Efficacy of B6 and Metoclopramide Combination in Comparison With the Other Antiemetics

Enhancing Antiemetic Efficacy: A Randomized Trial of Vitamin B6 and Metoclopramide Combination Therapy Versus Traditional Regimens

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06390787
Enrollment
250
Registered
2024-04-30
Start date
2024-01-30
Completion date
2024-04-21
Last updated
2024-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vomiting

Keywords

Vomiting, B6 Vitamin, Metoclopramide, Zofran

Brief summary

This study investigates the effectiveness of combining vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide compared to standard antiemetic treatments for managing nausea and vomiting. Through a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving adult patients with diverse causes of nausea and vomiting, we aim to evaluate the frequency, severity, and tolerability of the B6 and metoclopramide combination. By elucidating its comparative efficacy against established antiemetics, this research seeks to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians in selecting optimal treatment regimens tailored to individual patient needs, ultimately enhancing the management of nausea and vomiting across various medical conditions.

Detailed description

Title: Investigating the Efficacy of B6 and Metoclopramide Combination Versus Alternative Antiemetics: A Clinical Trial Proposal Introduction: Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms across various medical conditions and can significantly impact patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes. While several antiemetic medications exist, finding the most effective regimen remains a clinical challenge. This proposal aims to investigate the efficacy of a combination therapy comprising vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide compared to other antiemetics in managing nausea and vomiting. Rationale: Both vitamin B6 and metoclopramide have shown antiemetic properties through different mechanisms of action. However, the comparative efficacy of this combination therapy against other standard antiemetics remains largely unexplored. Understanding the relative effectiveness of this combination could provide valuable insights into optimizing antiemetic strategies, particularly in patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other related conditions. Objectives: This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of B6 and metoclopramide combination therapy compared to alternative antiemetic regimens in reducing the frequency and severity of nausea and vomiting episodes in adult patients. Additionally, the study seeks to assess the safety profile and tolerability of the combination therapy. Conclusion: By elucidating the comparative efficacy of B6 and metoclopramide combination therapy, this study endeavors to contribute to evidence-based decision-making in the management of nausea and vomiting. The findings could potentially guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate antiemetic regimen tailored to individual patient needs, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

Interventions

DRUGMetoclopramide and Vitamin B6

We gave a combination of vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

We gave only vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

DRUGOndansetron

We gave only Zofran as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

DRUGMetoclopramide

We gave only Metoclopramide as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

Sponsors

University of Baghdad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any patients with vomiting

Exclusion criteria

* Patients vitally unstable

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nausea1 dayFour characteristics of nausea typically were measured including duration, frequency, severity, and associated distress. Duration was measured by asking the patient if they had experienced nausea and/or the number of hours that nausea was experienced during the time frame addressed.
Vomiting1 dayFour characteristics of vomiting typically were measured including duration, frequency, severity, and associated distress. Duration was measured by asking the patient if they had experienced vomiting and/or the number of hours that vomiing was experienced during the time frame addressed.

Countries

Iraq

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026