Skip to content

Adolescent Interpersonal Counseling in Primary Care

Adolescent Depression Treatment Pathways in Primary Care - a Longitudinal Cohort Study Describing Naturalistic Flow of Treatment and Evaluating Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Interpersonal Counseling Compared to Treatment as Usual

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06390462
Enrollment
9000
Registered
2024-04-30
Start date
2024-03-25
Completion date
2039-12-31
Last updated
2025-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Symptoms Mild to Moderate in Severity, Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

adolescent, depression, prospective, cohort study, interpersonal counseling, prevention, therapy, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, predictor, economic evaluation

Brief summary

The demand for prevention and treatment of adolescent depression has rapidly increased over years. A national project to improve treatment of adolescent depression in primary care has taken place in Finland starting 2020. The goal of this prospective observational cohort study is to describe pathways to mental health services in adolescents with depressive symptoms. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Do young people reporting depressive symptoms have equal access to treatment? * How is it best to recognize those adolescents who will benefit from IPC-A? Adolescents who participate in the study will * complete a survey on protective and risk factors of depression three times over 6 months * report possible depressive symptoms every two weeks over 6 months * report whether they needed and received help, motivation for treatment, and benefits and harms from treatment We will also collect * information from one of caretakers with two surveys within 6 month- intervals on their view on adolescent's need for support, strengths and risks, and benefits and harms from treatment where applicable * where applicable, from the professional who provided support after the intervention on their training and competence, as well as content of and response to treatment * register data to estimate overall provision and cost of social welfare and health care services one year preceding the study and over 2 to 10 years after the observation period Researchers will compare an intervention that is new in Finland, adolescent interpersonal counseling (IPC-A), to other treatments of depression, to see if it is equal to or better than other treatments of depression.

Detailed description

Background: Implementation of evidence-based interventions is one of the proposed responses to increased demand for prevention and treatment of adolescent depression. A national implementation of adolescent interpersonal counseling (IPC-A) has taken place in Finland starting 2020. While the efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT-A) as an intervention to treat depression of adolescents is well established, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the shorter adaptation, IPC-A, remains open. Investigators present a protocol for an evaluation of pathways to mental health services of depressed adolescents and a prospective, observational community-based cohort study to estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IPC-A, as compared to adolescents with sustained depression with treatment as usual or no treatment. Methods: The cohort will include grade 7 to 9 adolescents (13-16-year-olds) in selected Finnish schools, excluding adolescents with preceding treatment of depression. A universal prospective evaluation of adolescents in a 6-month follow-up will provide information on the proportion of adolescents a) with sustained depression over the follow-up period (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 items, PHQ-9 ≥ 10) in two measurements over 6 months), b) with a self-reported need for support due to depressive symptoms, and c) with a therapeutic intervention. The investigators will describe the treatment received (number of sessions, therapeutic content) based on reports from adolescents, caretakers, and therapists, as well as electronic patient records. The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of adolescents who will receive specialized psychiatric services by 12 months after baseline. Secondary outcome measures comparing three groups as defined at 6 months (IPC-A, treatment as usual (TAU), or no treatment group). They will include proportion of adolescents who received any support by 12 months after baseline, and longitudinal changes in PHQ-9-A scores by 12 months. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated using survey data at 12 months, and an economic evaluation using register data and information on service use 12 months before and 2 and 10 years after baseline. Collection of survey data is expected to start in March 2024 and is set to finish in May 2025. Discussion: The study will describe need for, pathways to, and content of social and health services for depressed adolescents. Benefits and harms of treatment and the national implementation will be observed. The results can improve detection and equal access to care, and inform decision-makers about the best practices for prevention, including utility of the implementation of IPC-A.

Interventions

A structured psychotherapeutic intervention to prevent depression or treat mild to moderate depression. IPC-A is a brief, individual-based intervention (3-8 sessions). The focus is on interpersonal relations as a factor of resilience in depressive symptoms. IPC-A is a shorter form of IPT-A, developed by prof. Myrna Weissman and team.

BEHAVIORALTreatment as usual

Any other behavioral or medical support or depression indicated by depressive symptoms or depression. This is based on adolescent, caretaker and professional's report.

OTHERNo support, intervention or other treatment

The group will comprise those adolescents who report sustained depression but do not seek or receive support over 6 months of follow-up based on adolescent and caretaker's report

Sponsors

Strategic Research Council of Finland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Helsinki
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Eastern Finland
CollaboratorOTHER
Tampere University
CollaboratorOTHER
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* we will include all adolescents attending grades 7 to 9 in selected schools with on informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* psychiatric care within the past 12 months or receiving a psychosocial intervention (psychotherapy, IPC-A, any other therapy of support) during the 12 months before baseline, * an inability to reliably understand the Finnish, Plain Finnish, Swedish, or English versions of the survey, or * an adolescents' or caretakers' report of a need for exclusion, such as another medical condition - including a mental disorder - requiring acute current treatment or support.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of adolescents referred to specialized psychiatric servicesFrom baseline to 12 monthsProportion of adolescents in each three groups with sustained depressive symptoms by 6 months who receive specialized psychiatric services by 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of adolescents who received any social welfare or health care servicesUp to 10 years after baselineData collected from adolescent and caretaker's surveys and registers
longitudinal changes in PHQ-9-A score2 weeksLongitudinal changes in biweekly PHQ-9-A scores over 6 months; PHQ-9-A 10 items, 0 to 3, higher score more depression

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-72 weeksGAD-7, 7 items 0 to 3, higher score more anxiety
The Short Warwick-Edinburg Mental Wellbeing Scale2 weeksSWEMWBS, 7 items for positive mental health 0 to 4, higher score more positive mental health
LonelinessNo time frameOne item: Do you feel lonely? yes/no
3x10D life situation assessment toolNo time frame3x10-Dx, 10 items 0 to 0, higher score better life situation
Harmful behavior: Alcohol and substance use, self-harming behaviorEver, past 30 daysQuestions yes/no, open field
Young Person's Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure1 weekYP-CORE; 10 items 0 to 4, higher score better outcome
Experiences of Social Inclusion ScaleNo time frame10 items, 0 to 4, higher score more inclusion
The child-friendly EuroQol-5 dimensions questionnaireThe same dayEQ-5D-Y, 5 items 0 to 2; a VAS scale, higher score more functional

Countries

Finland

Contacts

Primary ContactOuti Linnaranta, MD, PhD
outi.linnaranta@thl.fi+358504327128
Backup ContactJasmin Kaljadin, MSc
jasmin.kaljadin@thl.fi+358295247728

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026