Skip to content

Buccal Midazolam Versus Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Plus Oral Chloral Hydrate in Inguinal Hernia Repair

Comparison Between Buccal Midazolam Versus Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Plus Oral Chloral Hydrate in Reducing Parental Separation Anxiety in Children Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06389318
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-04-29
Start date
2023-03-26
Completion date
2024-04-24
Last updated
2024-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia Repair

Keywords

Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, Chloral Hydrate

Brief summary

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures in early infancy. Preoperative anxiety remains a vexing issue, and it exists in nearly 50% of pediatric patients

Detailed description

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures in early infancy. Preoperative anxiety remains a vexing issue, and it exists in nearly 50% of pediatric patients. The administration of sedatives to a child before entering a surgical room is the most common way of reducing the child's distress and allows the child to undergo smooth anesthesia induction. Chloral hydrate is a widely used sedative for young children undergoing imaging studies, with a high success rate. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 agonist for paediatric sedation. It produces sedation like natural non-rapid eye movement sleep and has respiratory-sparing effect.

Interventions

DRUGbuccal midazolam +oral placebo syrup

Children received oral chloral hydrate (Chloral Hydrate mixture, concentration at 0.5gm/5ml, 250 ml bottle, prepared at abo Elreesh pharmacy, Elmoneerah , Egypt) at 50 mg /kg, intranasal dexmedetomidine at 2 μg/kg and buccal normal saline. Dexmedetomidine used was preservative-free dexmedetomidine (Precedex, 2ml ampoule,100 ug /ml, Hospira, Inc, Rocky Mount, USA) in a concentration of 100 μg/mL. Undiluted drug was withdrawn into a 1 mL tuberculin syringe.

DRUGoral chloral hydrate,intranasal dexmedetomidine and buccal normal saline

Children received oral chloral hydrate (Chloral Hydrate mixture, concentration at 0.5gm/5ml, 250 ml bottle, prepared at abo Elreesh pharmacy, Elmoneerah , Egypt) at 50 mg /kg, intranasal dexmedetomidine at 2 μg/kg and buccal normal saline. Dexmedetomidine used was preservative-free dexmedetomidine (Precedex, 2ml ampoule,100 ug /ml, Hospira, Inc, Rocky Mount, USA) in a concentration of 100 μg/mL. Undiluted drug was withdrawn into a 1 mL tuberculin syringe.

Sponsors

Benha University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

Both participant and the care-provider in this trial were blinded.

Intervention model description

Group A (40 patients): Children received oral placebo syrup, Group B (40 patients): Children received oral chloral hydrate (Chloral Hydrate mixture)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* aged 2 to 7 * American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) І and П scheduled for inguinal hernia repair

Exclusion criteria

* sensitivity to dexmedetomidine or midazolam, * infection of the upper respiratory tract, * severe liver or kidney disease, organ dysfunction, * cardiac arrhythmia or congenital heart disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ramsay sedation scoreRSSs were recorded just immediately before and at 10 minutes , 20 minutes , 30 minutes after dosingThe scoring criteria were as follows: (1) patient shows anxiety and restlessness; (2) patient is cooperative, oriented, and quiet; (3) patient is responsive to instructions; (4) patient shows somnolence and responsive to the tapping of the glabella or to loud auditory stimuli; (5) patient shows somnolence and unresponsive to the tapping of the glabella or to loud auditory stimuli; and (6) patient shows somnolence without any response.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parental separation anxiety scalePreoperativelyParental separation anxiety scale was determined when the child was separated from the parents according to four levels: 1. easy to separate 2. sobbing but easy to cease 3. crying loudly and difficult to stop but without holding the parents and not letting them go 4. crying loudly and holding the parents and not willing to let them go. PSAS scores of 1 and 2 were considered successful separation from parents

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026