Skip to content

Endovascular Treatment for eXtra-Large Ischemic Stroke

Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Thrombectomy Plus Medical Management Versus Medical Management Alone in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion and Extra-Large Infarct Core: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06388148
Acronym
XL STROKE-2
Enrollment
286
Registered
2024-04-29
Start date
2024-06-16
Completion date
2027-01-31
Last updated
2025-12-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, Acute Ischemic

Brief summary

The role of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with extra-large ischemic burden is still unclear. The XL STROKE-2 randomized trial is aiming to investigate the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in acute extra-large ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion.

Detailed description

Several randomized trials have shown that endovascular thrombectomy improve functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. Recently, six randomized controlled trials demonstrated the efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy for large infarct patients (defined as Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score \[ASPECTS\] ≥3 or infarct core \<100ml). Patients with extra-large infarct core (volume greater than 100 mL, ASPECTS score of 0 to 2) accounted for a small proportion of these trials. Therefore, the role of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with extra-large ischemic burden is still unclear. That is to say, exactly where the lower limit of endovascular thrombectomy is unknown. The XL STROKE-2 randomized trial is aiming to investigate the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in acute extra-large ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion.

Interventions

DRUGMedical management

Medical management includes IV thrombolysis, antiplatelet, and/or anticoagulation.

PROCEDUREEndovascular thrombectomy

Endovascular thrombectomy with stent-retriever, local aspiration, angioplasty, and/or stenting.

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Xiangtan Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Taizhou First People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhongming Qiu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 years or older, and modified Rankin scale score = 0 or 1 in patients 80 years or older; 2. Acute ischemic stroke within 6 hours from last known well to randomization, or with negative MRI-FLAIR (no change on FLAIR sequence and presence of infarct on MRI-DWI) if \> 6 hours or unknown last known well time; 3. Occlusion of the internal carotid artery, M1 or M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery confirmed by CTA/MRA/DSA; 4. Baseline ASPECTS score of 0-2 or infarct core volume ≥100ml; 5. The patient or patient's representative signs a written informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. CT or MR evidence of hemorrhage; 2. Evidence of mass effect with ventricular effacement, midline shift or herniation on baseline imaging; 3. Vessel tortuosity where it is expected that the thrombectomy device will not be able to reach the occlusion site or result in unstable access; 4. History of bleeding disorders, severe heart, liver or kidney disease, or sepsis; 5. Currently participating in another investigational drug study; 6. Any terminal illness with life expectancy less than 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Rankin Scale score90 days after randomizationModified Rankin scale score (mRS): scores range from 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no disability, 1 no clinically significant disability, 2 slight disability, 3 moderate disability but able to walk unassisted, 4 moderately severe disability, 5 severe disability, and 6 death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of successful reperfusionWithin 5 minutes at the end of angiogramFinal reperfusion grade of 2b-3 on eTICI scale (This 7-point compilation of TICI grades, termed the expanded TICI (eTICI), reflects all previously reported thresholds used to define reperfusion after endovascular stroke therapy. In brief, eTICI grade 0 is equivalent to no reperfusion or 0% filling of the downstream territory; eTICI 1 reflects thrombus reduction without any reperfusion of distal arteries; eTICI 2a is reperfusion in less than half or 1-49% of the territory; eTICI 2b50 is 50-66% reperfusion, exceeding the modified TICI (mTICI) 2B threshold but below the original TICI 2B cut-off point; eTICI 2b67 is 67-89% reperfusion, exceeding TICI but below TICI 2C; eTICI 2c is equivalent to TICI 2C or 90-99% reperfusion; and eTICI 3 is complete or 100% reperfusion, tantamount to TICI 3.)
Rate of excellent outcome90 days after randomizationScore of 0-1 on the modified Rankin scale
Rate of functional independence90 days after randomizationScore of 0-2 on the modified Rankin scale
Rate of independent ambulation90 days after randomizationScore of 0-3 on the modified Rankin scale

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactZhongfan Ruan
ruanzhongfan@sina.com15616320002
Backup ContactZhongming Qiu
qiuzhongmingdoctor@163.com13236599269

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026