Skip to content

Compont - Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremities

Efficacy and Safety of Medical Adhesive in the Treatment of Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremities: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06387264
Enrollment
188
Registered
2024-04-29
Start date
2023-01-11
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Varicose Veins of Lower Limb

Keywords

Varicose Veins of Lower Limb, NBCA

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Medical Adhesive produced by Beijing Compont Medical Devices Co., Ltd. in the treatment of varicose veins in the lower extremities. The main questions it aims to answer is: What medical problems do participants have when using tissue glue? Researchers will compare Medical Adhesive to ClosureFast Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Catheter (produced by Medtronic Inc. to see if Medical Adhesive works to treat varicose veins in the lower extremities. Participants will: Treated with closed varicose veins of the lower extremity by Medical Adhesive or ClosureFast. Return to the hospital at 1, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively for Doppler ultrasound, and at 4, 12, 24 weeks postoperatively for venous scoring.

Interventions

DEVICEMedical Adhesive

Medical Adhesive (produced by Beijing Compont Medical Devices Co., Ltd.) For varicose veins in the main saphenous vein, use 0.1 ml glue for every 3 cm of blood vessels.

DEVICEClosureFast Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation(RFA) Catheter

ClosureFast Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Catheter (produced by America Medtronic Inc.) The ClosureFast catheter precisely heats a 7 cm vein segment in one 20-second interval.

Sponsors

Peking University First Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
CollaboratorOTHER
Liaocheng People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinically diagnosed as great saphenous vein varices. (This operation only dealt with one side varicose veins of the lower extremities.) * CEAP is graded C2-C6. * Doppler ultrasound confirmed the patency of deep veins of lower limbs. * Sign informed consent, voluntarily participate in the trial and follow up as required

Exclusion criteria

* A history of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism * Recurrent varicose veins * The diameter of target lesion of the great saphenous vein less than 2 mm or more than 15 mm * The great saphenous vein is severely distorted or tuberculated at the root * Sepsis or septicemia * Allergic to n-butyl cyanoacrylate * The distance between the skin and the target vessel wall of the great saphenous vein less than 5 mm * Severe cardiopulmonary disease, shock, coma or multiple organ failure * Lactating or pregnant women * Participated in other clinical trials within 1 month before surgery * The researchers considered it unsuitable for inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical success rate24 weeks after operation.At 24 weeks after surgery, Doppler ultrasound was used to check the closure of the target blood vessels.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target vascular closure rate at 12 weeks after operation.12 weeks after operation.At 12 weeks after surgery, Doppler ultrasound was used to check the closure of the target blood vessels.
Clinical signsScreening period, 12 and 24 weeks after operation.The severity of the patient's clinical presentation was assessed according to the Clinical signs- etiologic classification- anatomic distribution- pathophysiologic dysfunction classification (CEAP classification) criteria. classification are as follows. C0: Without any visible or palpable signs of disease. C1: Telangiectasia or reticular veins C2: Varicose veins C2r: Recurrent varicose veins C3: Edema is present. C4: Changes in skin and subcutaneous tissue C4a: Pigmentation or eczema C4b: Lipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche C4c: Corona phlebectatica C5: Healed ulcers C6: Active ulcers C6r: Recurrent active venous ulcer
Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)Screening period, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after operation.The VCSS score ranges from 0 to 30, with a larger value indicating approximately severe symptoms.
Technical success rateImmediately after operationImmediately after operation, Doppler ultrasound was used to check the closure of the target blood vessels.
Operation durationImmediately after operation
Evaluation of product performancewithin 24 hours after operationThe researchers evaluated the operation performance of the product from the aspects of ease of operation and injection function, and divided the evaluation into three levels: satisfactory, general and unsatisfactory.
Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ)Screening period, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after operation.AVVQ scores range between 0 and 33, a higher score indicates a lower quality of life for patients.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026