Skip to content

Radial Shockwave Versus Ultrasound Phonophoresis

Radial Shockwave Versus Ultrasound Phonophoresis in Management of Chronic Supraspinatus Tendinitis

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06386926
Enrollment
69
Registered
2024-04-26
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2024-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Supraspinatus Tendinitis

Keywords

Shockwave , phonophoresis , supraspinatus tendinitis

Brief summary

Comparative study to compare the effect of radial shockwave versus ultrasound phonophoresis in management of chronic supraspinatus tendinitis consists of 3 groups exp1(shockwave treatment + conventional physical therapy) , exp2( ultrasound phonophoresis+ conventional physical therapy) and control group ( conventional physical therapy)

Interventions

OTHERElectro Therapy

radial shockwave 3 sessions one session per week for four consecutive weeks ,receive Ultrasound phonophoresis using diclofenac Na+ 12 session, 3 sessions per week and conventional physical therapy modalities in the form of 3 sessions every week for 8 weeks

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- BMI 18.5-24.9 * 18 years to 60 * with Unilateral Chronic Supraspinatus Tendinitis. * Tenderness is found over the supraspinatus as it passes sub-acrominal and anterolateral. * The patient reported with positive Jobe's test (empty can test) * The patient reported pain with active shoulder elevation in the scapular plane (eg: welders, plate workers, slaughterhouse workers and overhead playing athletes). * The patient reported pain with resisted isometric abduction

Exclusion criteria

* Case reports, treatments after surgery, did not meet our specified outcome parameters, traumatic incidents, * Partial tears at surgery * Massive retracted tears at surgery * Frozen shoulder. * Rotator cuff tear. * Glenohumeral or acromioclavicular arthritis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in the thickness of supraspinatus tendonbefore start of treatment and 4 weeks following end of treatmentUltrasonography
change in pain intesitybefore start of treatment and 4 weeks following end of treatment , score from 0-10 ,0=no pain , 10= unbearable painVAS ( visual analog scale score)
Change in shoulder range of motionbefore start of treatment and 4 weeks following end of treatmentelectro goniometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Function of the Upper Limbbefore start of treatment and 4 weeks following end of treatment, it measure the disability/symptom section (11 items, scored 1-5)Quick DASH Questionnaire score
measure weight in kg and height in cmbefore starting the assessmentWeight and height scale for determining BMI

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactShady Alkadry
shad.bahaa@gmail.com+201128398533

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026